Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Ethics | 2 |
| Evaluators | 2 |
| Career Development | 1 |
| Career Planning | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Codes of Ethics | 1 |
| Consultants | 1 |
| Critical Incidents Method | 1 |
| Entrepreneurship | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Directions for Evaluation | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMathison, Sandra – New Directions for Evaluation, 1999
Highlights differences related to the ethics of the evaluation situation for internal and external evaluators and differences related to the attention evaluators pay to the ethics of the evaluand. Internal and external evaluations occupy different "communities," and it is the nature of those communities that is critical for the…
Descriptors: Codes of Ethics, Comparative Analysis, Ethics, Evaluation Methods
Direct linkBarrington, Gail V. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
The purpose of the study reported in this chapter was to determine if senior evaluation consultants experienced stages of growth in their practice similar to the small business development stages described by Bruce and Scott, to identify the stimuli that led to those changes, to determine what the consultants learned from these incidents, and to…
Descriptors: Career Planning, Career Development, Program Evaluation, Evaluators
