NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Azin, Mariam; Resendez, Miriam G. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
Evaluators face a number of challenges in using student assessment data, given varying state and federal accountability requirements. Approaches to measuring student progress and specific characteristics of state assessment systems influence how data can be used. The continuous changes to state assessment systems and data create a significant…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Student Evaluation, Federal Legislation, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ritter, Lois A., Ed.; Sue, Valerie M., Ed. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
The general steps in conducting an evaluation using an online survey are the same as in using other methods: planning, data collection, data analysis, reporting, and application. Even though the process of evaluation using Internet-based surveys begins in a familiar manner, the unique requirements of the online methodology become apparent almost…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Internet, Surveys, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rossi, Peter H. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
Over the past decade, quantitative methods have evolved to provide evaluators with more effective means for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting information. The advances discussed are: (1) facilitating advances that consist of changes that make carrying out quantitative evaluation easier; (2) advances in measurement; and (3) advances in…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mark, Melvin M.; Eyssell, Kristen M.; Campbell, Bernadette – New Directions for Evaluation, 1999
Focuses on ethical issues that can arise in the collection and analysis of data in evaluations. Addresses four issues: (1) the application of cost-benefit thinking to judgments about research ethics, (2) the quality of research design, (3) the need to explore the data, and (4) the censoring of data. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scheirer, Mary Ann – New Directions for Evaluation, 1996
This eight chapters of this special issue introduce the use of a template to specify program components as a new tool for program evaluation. The template articulates the components needed for program delivery and provides a systematic method for assessing program implementation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Durland, Maryann M. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2005
Although the process of doing social network analysis (SNA) is similar to traditional research and evaluation design, it is in the details that the two traditions diverge. This article describes two areas of differences: (1) the framework for doing SNA; and (2) data collection, analysis, and specific measures. SNA is about relationships and how to…
Descriptors: Network Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Social Networks, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jarosewich, Tania; Essenmacher, Victoria L.; Lynch, Christina Olenik; Williams, Jennifer E.; Doino-Ingersoll, Jo Ann – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
The American Evaluation Association's (AEA) Independent Consulting Topical Interest Group (IC TIG) has a membership of over eight hundred individuals who generally work as sole proprietors, in partnerships, or in small consulting firms. Well over a decade ago, the IC TIG conducted a survey of its membership (Bonnet, 1992). To gather current data…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Attitude Measures, Small Businesses, Industry