NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)11
Source
New Directions for Evaluation15
Audience
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 15 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roseland, Denise; Volkov, Boris B.; Callow-Heusser, Catherine – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
In contrast to typical National Science Foundation program evaluations, the Utah State Math Science Partnership-Research, Evaluation and Technical Assistance Project (MSP-RETA) provided technical assistance (TA) in two forms: direct TA for up to 10 projects a year, and professional development sessions for a larger number of project staff. Not…
Descriptors: Professional Development, Mathematics, Sciences, Interdisciplinary Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goodyear, Leslie K. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
New and novel uses of evaluation processes and findings are possible when a community of practice develops as evaluation stakeholders participate in multisite evaluations in multiple ways. Developing such communities takes advantage of what makes multisite evaluations special. This chapter uses the example of the Innovative Technology Experiences…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, STEM Education, Communities of Practice, Learning Resources Centers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Greenseid, Lija O.; Lawrenz, Frances – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
A team at the University of Minnesota conducted the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) core evaluation between 1999 and 2004. The purpose of the CETP core evaluation was to achieve consensus among CETP project leaders and project evaluators on evaluation questions; to develop, pilot, and field test evaluation instruments…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Teacher Education, Program Evaluation, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Johnson, Kelli; Weiss, Iris R. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) contracted with principal investigator Iris Weiss and an evaluation team at Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) to conduct a national evaluation of the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program (LSC). HRI conducted the core evaluation under a $6.25 million contract with NSF. This program…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eddy, Rebecca M.; Berry, Tiffany – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
The field of evaluation faces a number of serious challenges in light of No Child Left Behind legislation, among them feasibility, resources, and blurring lines among research, evaluation, and assessment. At the same time, these challenges open the door for opportunities in evaluation. Now more than ever, the expertise of evaluators is needed and…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Federal Legislation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schmitt, Lisa N. T.; Whitsett, Maria Defino – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
A district evaluator in a large Texas district examines new challenges arising since implementation of No Child Left Behind, relating to (1) navigating competing requirements in state and federal accountability systems; (2) evaluating effectiveness of sanctions districts are required to address; (3) using scientifically based research (SBR) to…
Descriptors: Management Systems, Evaluators, Sanctions, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rodosky, Robert J.; Munoz, Marco A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2009
The authors write about evaluation, testing, and research and their relation to policy, planning, and program in the Jefferson County Public Schools (JCPS) in Louisville, Kentucky. The authors focus on evaluation and testing for accountability and on managing the unit for this purpose. In detail they show the many evaluation demands from both…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Testing, Accountability, School Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guillen-Woods, Blanca Flor; Kaiser, Monica A.; Harrington, Maura J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
The impact of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is usually understood in relation to schools and districts, but the legislation has also affected community-based organizations that operate school-linked programs. This case study of an after-school program in California demonstrates how educational accountability systems that emphasize students' academic…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Federal Legislation, Program Improvement, After School Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Jean A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
This article discusses how to make process use an independent variable in evaluation practice: the purposeful means of building an organization's capacity to conduct and use evaluations in the long run. The goal of evaluation capacity building (ECB) is to strengthen and sustain effective program evaluation practices through a number of activities:…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Predictor Variables, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lawrenz, Frances; Huffman, Douglas; McGinnis, J. Randy – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
In this article, the authors examine evaluation process use in a large multilevel, multisite core evaluation. This case highlights the nature of the evaluation processes of the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) core evaluation in terms of four categories: (1) social processing; (2) engagement; (3) involvement; and (4)…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heubner, Tracy A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Explores how theory-based evaluation can be used to help conduct formative, reflective evaluation in educational settings. Program theory evaluation identifies links between planned activities and anticipated outcomes. This model helps schools clarify program goals, and builds cooperation and buy-in an evaluation as it encourages reflective…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Outcomes of Education, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pillow, Wanda S. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
Provides a historical review of feminist theory and research that provides a context for and offers critical challenges to contemporary ideas about the meanings and intents of feminist inquiry and evaluation. This overview demonstrates the continued importance of paying attention to gender, particularly in education. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational History, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lawrenz, Frances; Huffman, Douglas – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
Nationally, there is continuing debate about appropriate methods for conducting educational evaluations. The U.S. Department of Education has placed a priority on "scientifically" based evaluation methods and has advocated a "gold standard" of randomized controlled experimentation. The priority suggests that randomized control methods are best,…
Descriptors: Quasiexperimental Design, Information Technology, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hood, Stafford – New Directions for Evaluation, 2004
As is typically the case when this author sets fingers to keyboard and writes about evaluation, his intent is to offer his work and perspective as "one" African American evaluator. The impetus for the thoughts and ideas he expresses in this article were prompted by his preparation to attend and present a paper at the inaugural annual…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Schools, Cultural Context
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Jean A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2005
The author describes potential evaluation capacity-building activities in contrast to the specifics of an evaluation design. Her response to the case of the Bunche-Da Vinci Learning Partnership Academy is developed in three parts: (1) an initial framing of the Bunche-Da Vinci situation; (2) what should be done before signing a contract; and (3)…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Action Research, Program Content