Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Problems | 7 |
Program Evaluation | 7 |
Evaluation Methods | 4 |
Evaluation Utilization | 3 |
Case Studies | 2 |
Democracy | 2 |
Evaluation Research | 2 |
Evaluators | 2 |
Stakeholders | 2 |
Agenda Setting | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
New Directions for Evaluation | 7 |
Author
Greene, Jennifer C. | 1 |
King, Jean A. | 1 |
Kirkhart, Karen E. | 1 |
Lawrenz, Frances | 1 |
Ooms, Ann | 1 |
Picciotto, Robert, Ed. | 1 |
Rist, Ray C., Ed. | 1 |
Stake, Robert E. | 1 |
VanLandingham, Gary R. | 1 |
Yates, Brian T. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Collected Works - Serials | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kirkhart, Karen E. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
Understanding the influence of multisite evaluation requires careful consideration of cultural context. The author illustrates dimensions of influence and culture with excerpts from four National Science Foundation evaluation case studies and summarizes what influence teaches everyone about culture and what culture teaches everyone about…
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Cultural Context, Evaluation Research, Program Evaluation
Yates, Brian T. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2012
The value of a program can be understood as referring not only to outcomes, but also to how those outcomes compare to the types and amounts of resources expended to produce the outcomes. Major potential mistakes and biases in assessing the worth of resources consumed, as well as the value of outcomes produced, are explored. Most of these occur…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Cost Effectiveness, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Problems
Lawrenz, Frances; King, Jean A.; Ooms, Ann – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
A cross-case analysis of four National Science Foundation (NSF) case studies identified both unique details and common themes related to promoting the use and influence of multisite evaluations. The analysis provided evidence of diverse evaluation use by stakeholders and suggested that people taking part in the multisite evaluations perceived…
Descriptors: Role Perception, Participation, Case Studies, Program Evaluation

Greene, Jennifer C. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Reflects on an evaluation that aspired to be inclusive but generally failed to provide a backdrop for a discussion of inclusive evaluation. Identifies issues of absence of significant stakeholders, making of values by method, and the limited authority of the evaluation. Shows how easily deliberative intentions are distorted. (SLD)
Descriptors: Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Program Evaluation

Stake, Robert E. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Challenges the assumption that evaluation should aim for fostering deliberative democracy. A modest effort by an evaluator to contribute to deliberative democracy is defensible, but vigorous political advocacy violates social expectation. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluators
VanLandingham, Gary R. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
While legislative oversight offices, like many evaluation and policy analysis units, face substantial challenges in promoting use of their work by policymakers, they often have not taken steps to overcome these challenges by adopting the strategies suggested by the evaluation literature. Although the offices seek utilization, they have not fully…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Policy Analysis, Marketing, Program Evaluation

Picciotto, Robert, Ed.; Rist, Ray C., Ed. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1995
This issue and its introductions, postscript, and 11 chapters deal with the special evaluation problems of programs in the developing world. Views of policymakers, practitioners, and evaluators on ways to evaluate development are presented. The collection offers a framework for debate and proposes new emphases for development evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Agenda Setting, Developing Nations, Economic Development, Evaluation Methods