NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zeller-Berkman, Sarah – New Directions for Evaluation, 2010
A critical theory lens is used to explore the role of evaluation in youth development, a field aimed at recognizing youth as assets. A theory of change in the field is questioned for its emphasis on individual youth outcomes as programmatic outcome measures. A review of 209 evaluations of 131 programs in the Harvard Family Research Project's…
Descriptors: Critical Theory, Youth Programs, Evaluation, Outcomes of Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Braverman, Marc T.; Arnold, Mary E. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
Methodological rigor consists of a series of elements that, in combination, determine the confidence with which conclusions can be drawn from the evaluation results. These elements include evaluation design, conceptualization of constructs, measurement strategies, time frames, program integrity, and others. The authors examine the factors that…
Descriptors: Information Needs, Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lawrenz, Frances; Huffman, Douglas; McGinnis, J. Randy – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
In this article, the authors examine evaluation process use in a large multilevel, multisite core evaluation. This case highlights the nature of the evaluation processes of the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) core evaluation in terms of four categories: (1) social processing; (2) engagement; (3) involvement; and (4)…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Madison, Anna – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
Over the past twenty years several topics covered in "New Directions for Evaluation" (NDE) are relevant to underrepresented groups, including cultural sensitivity; cultural competence; stakeholder-based, responsive, democratic deliberation; and participatory evaluation theories, methodologies, and practices. Also, the topic of social justice and…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Social Justice, Minority Groups, Disproportionate Representation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rossi, Peter H. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
Over the past decade, quantitative methods have evolved to provide evaluators with more effective means for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting information. The advances discussed are: (1) facilitating advances that consist of changes that make carrying out quantitative evaluation easier; (2) advances in measurement; and (3) advances in…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Durland, Maryann M. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2005
Although the process of doing social network analysis (SNA) is similar to traditional research and evaluation design, it is in the details that the two traditions diverge. This article describes two areas of differences: (1) the framework for doing SNA; and (2) data collection, analysis, and specific measures. SNA is about relationships and how to…
Descriptors: Network Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Social Networks, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jarosewich, Tania; Essenmacher, Victoria L.; Lynch, Christina Olenik; Williams, Jennifer E.; Doino-Ingersoll, Jo Ann – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
The American Evaluation Association's (AEA) Independent Consulting Topical Interest Group (IC TIG) has a membership of over eight hundred individuals who generally work as sole proprietors, in partnerships, or in small consulting firms. Well over a decade ago, the IC TIG conducted a survey of its membership (Bonnet, 1992). To gather current data…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Attitude Measures, Small Businesses, Industry