Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 11 |
Participation | 11 |
Program Evaluation | 8 |
Case Studies | 4 |
Evaluators | 4 |
Educational Research | 3 |
Evaluation Research | 3 |
Population Groups | 3 |
Stakeholders | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Data Collection | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
New Directions for Evaluation | 11 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 11 |
Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Roseland, Denise; Volkov, Boris B.; Callow-Heusser, Catherine – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
In contrast to typical National Science Foundation program evaluations, the Utah State Math Science Partnership-Research, Evaluation and Technical Assistance Project (MSP-RETA) provided technical assistance (TA) in two forms: direct TA for up to 10 projects a year, and professional development sessions for a larger number of project staff. Not…
Descriptors: Professional Development, Mathematics, Sciences, Interdisciplinary Approach
Toal, Stacie A.; Gullickson, Arlen R. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
In 1999, the National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded funds to the Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University to conduct an external evaluation of the Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program. ATE, a federally mandated program designed to increase the number and quality of skilled technicians in the U.S. workforce, has funded over 346…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Technology Education
Lawrenz, Frances; King, Jean A.; Ooms, Ann – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
A cross-case analysis of four National Science Foundation (NSF) case studies identified both unique details and common themes related to promoting the use and influence of multisite evaluations. The analysis provided evidence of diverse evaluation use by stakeholders and suggested that people taking part in the multisite evaluations perceived…
Descriptors: Role Perception, Participation, Case Studies, Program Evaluation
Greenseid, Lija O.; Lawrenz, Frances – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
A team at the University of Minnesota conducted the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) core evaluation between 1999 and 2004. The purpose of the CETP core evaluation was to achieve consensus among CETP project leaders and project evaluators on evaluation questions; to develop, pilot, and field test evaluation instruments…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Teacher Education, Program Evaluation, Evaluators
Harnar, Michael A.; Preskill, Hallie – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
In "Utilization Focused Evaluation" (1997), Patton introduced the term "process use" to describe changes in thinking and behavior, whether at the individual, program, or organizational level, as a result of one's participation in an evaluation, irrespective of the evaluation results. In conversations with stakeholders, Patton found that although…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Behavior Change, Cognitive Processes
Lawrenz, Frances; Huffman, Douglas; McGinnis, J. Randy – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
In this article, the authors examine evaluation process use in a large multilevel, multisite core evaluation. This case highlights the nature of the evaluation processes of the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) core evaluation in terms of four categories: (1) social processing; (2) engagement; (3) involvement; and (4)…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques, Evaluation Research

House, Ernest R. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2003
Discusses the nature of stakeholder participation in evaluation and contrasts E. House's commitment to involving all stakeholders to ensure that interests of all are included with other theorists' preference to involve a few stakeholders more intensely. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Participation, Stakeholders, Theories

Torres, Rosalie T.; Preskill, Hallie – New Directions for Evaluation, 1999
Reviews critical dimensions in evaluation that emerge from efforts to promote use within a context of stakeholder participation. Case examples illustrate two potentially problematic domains: stakeholder selection and depth of stakeholder involvement. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization

Ryan, Katherine E.; Johnson, Trav D. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Uses the results of an instrumental case study to identify issues connected to evaluation participation and its representation and the role of the internal evaluator in democratic, deliberative evaluation. Identified direct participation and participation by representation, sanctioned or unsanctioned representation, and extrinsic and intrinsic…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Incentives

Hart, Roger A.; Rajbhandary, Jasmine – New Directions for Evaluation, 2003
Describes the participatory evaluation methods developed so that children participating in children's clubs in Nepal could use them in periodic reviews of their own functioning as creators of democratic organizations. (SLD)
Descriptors: Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Participation
Alkin, Marvin C.; Christie, Christina A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2005
The theorists whose work appears in this issue have confronted the exercise presented to them in vastly different ways. The editors of this journal asked these theorists to consider how they would evaluate the Bunche-Da Vinci program, and to make and specify assumptions about the program context. The primary task, however, was to describe "a…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Comparative Analysis, Participation