Descriptor
| Ethics | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Educational Improvement | 1 |
| Educational Practices | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Evaluation Problems | 1 |
| High Risk Students | 1 |
| Justice | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Moral Issues | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Directions for Program… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Collected Works - General | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedConner, Ross F. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
Is it ethical to select clients at random for a beneficial social service, then deny the benefits to a control group for the sake of science? Participation of control groups in planning, implementation and evaluation of social programs may resolve ethical issues. (Author/CP)
Descriptors: Control Groups, Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedSirotnik, Kenneth A., Ed. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1990
This issue includes four papers conceptualizing and analyzing the issues of evaluation and social justice. An evaluative model is presented as a way of improving educational practice at the school level. Implications of evaluation are examined relative to a moral and ethical stance rooted in conceptions of social justice. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Improvement, Educational Practices, Elementary Secondary Education, Ethics
