Descriptor
| Ethics | 3 |
| Evaluators | 3 |
| Program Evaluation | 3 |
| Role Conflict | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Change Agents | 1 |
| Codes of Ethics | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Evaluation Needs | 1 |
| Job Skills | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Directions for Program… | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSieber, Joan E. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
Evaluators experience conflicts between: role of scientist, administrator, and advocate; need for data v privacy; and pressures from clients v broader constituencies. To reduce conflict they must: plan; negotiate ethical work agreements; communicate effectively; and observe the ethical codes of beneficence, respect, and justice. (CP)
Descriptors: Codes of Ethics, Ethics, Evaluators, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
Bertram S. Brown, former director of the National Institute of Mental Health, discusses conflicts between scientific and value dimensions of evaluation. He relates this conflict to: usefulness of mental health program evaluations; conduct of internal evaluations; release of findings; training; rating of reports; and planned change consultation.…
Descriptors: Change Agents, Decision Making, Ethics, Evaluators
Peer reviewedClifford, David L.; Sherman, Paul – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
In defining the tasks of management and the complementary role of the evaluation professional, specific skills that the evaluator needs are outlined, markers of success are identified, and ethical issues that the internal evaluator must face are discussed. (PN)
Descriptors: Administrators, Adults, Ethics, Evaluation Needs
