NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cronbach, Lee J. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
Standardization is inimical to innovation. Although the function of a standard is to standardize, the Evaluation Research Society (ERS) Standards avoid a standardizing effect. Their contribution lies mostly in the symbolism of their existence: to issue a set of standards is to proclaim maturity of thought for the field. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Improvement, Innovation, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Boruch, Robert F.; Reis, Janet – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
Secondary analysis is a situation that argues for explicit training in methodology. Evaluative researchers are often required to extend analysis conducted by original evaluators of a program for reasons of dissatisfaction or incompleteness. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Professional Training, Program Evaluation, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shadish, William R., Jr.; And Others – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
Since usually no defensible option for performing a task within quasi-experimentation is unbiased, it is desirable to select several options that reflect biases in different directions. The benefits of applying a critical multiplism approach to causal hypotheses, group nonequivalence, and units of analysis in quasi-experimentation is discussed.…
Descriptors: Bias, Matched Groups, Program Evaluation, Quasiexperimental Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berk, Richard A. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
The dilemma inherent in formal standards results from the tension between maintaining quality control and constraining creativity. This dilemma is nowhere more apparent than in matters of method: measurement, sampling, research design, and statistical analysis. The author offers suggestions for revision of the standards to allow for specific…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Improvement, Innovation, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brandl, John E. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
To better understand policy formation, evaluators should be aware of the perspectives from which legislators view evaluators. Illustrations of the impact of evaluation and research projects on policy are provided. (Available from: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 433 California St., San Francisco, CA 94104, single issue, $6.95.) (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluators, Information Utilization, Legislators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Caplan, Nathan – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
Ethical issues; institutional characteristics and organizational arrangements; and roles and skills of the researcher must be considered if the government is to apply social science research findings more widely for the public good. (Available from: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 433 California St., San Francisco, CA 94104, single issue, $6.95.) (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Government Role, Information Utilization, Program Evaluation, Research Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carter, Launor F. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
The ERS Standards could affect the government contract work of large research and evaluation organizations by requiring (in the request for proposals) that work be done in accordance with the standards, incorporating the standards into the proposal, or including the standards in the contract boiler plate. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Federal Government, Organizational Change, Organizations (Groups), Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bryk, Anthony S.; Raudenbush, Stephen W. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
Stakeholder evaluation was designed to address widely recognized problems in the conduct of evaluation. However, global propositions about the problems and prospects of program evaluation obscure the circumstances in which social science can contribute to social problem solving. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Educational Policy, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods