NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Braskamp, Larry A.; And Others – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
Evaluation client characteristics are outlined, based on experiences of the Office of Instructional and Management Services, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and contract evaluators for industry and other higher education institutions. Objectivity, expertise, sensitivity to client needs, standardized data presentation,…
Descriptors: Contracts, Educational Assessment, Higher Education, Institutional Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Alkin, Marvin C.; Patton, Michael Quinn – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
The user-oriented and utilization-focused evaluation design of the two-year Caribbean Agricultural Extension Project, funded by Aid to International Development, is reviewed. The evaluation scope, stakeholders, evaluation team credibility, official approval of evaluation, and confidence in the evaluation process are addressed, within a…
Descriptors: Economic Development, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bickman, Leonard – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
Ten functions of program theory are reviewed: contributing to social science knowledge; assisting policymakers, discriminating between theory failure and program failure, identifying the problem and target group, providing program implementation description, uncovering unintended effects, specifying intervening variables, improving formative use…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Models, Problem Solving
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gunn, Walter J. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
Strategies for use by clients who commission evaluation studies in the private, university, or governmental sector are outlined. Topics covered include establishing the purpose of the evaluation, assembling in-house management staff, specifying work and expertise requirements, establishing confidentiality and project control, and managing results.…
Descriptors: Confidentiality, Contracts, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gold, Norman – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
Stakeholder-based studies modify the relationship between evaluator and user, producing conflict that can cause evaluators to regress to familiar, traditional patterns that leave interactive evaluation strategies only partially implemented. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shadish, William R. Jr. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
This article refers to two uses of the term "program theory": (1) microtheory to describe the model of the program; and (2) macrotheory which is concerned with factors that affect social change both within and outside programs. Barriers to successful utilization of evaluation and suggestions to overcome those barriers are discussed. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluators, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scheirer, Mary Ann – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
Program theory and implementation process theory contribute, respectively, to specifying the what and the why of program delivery. This article discusses the relationship between these two theories and the types of data collection methods that can be derived from each in order to contribute to more comprehensive evaluation designs. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Conrad, Kendon J.; Miller, Todd Q. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
A short history of program theory in evaluation is reviewed. Two related problems in program evaluation are discussed and illustrated: (1) how to specify in measurable terms the consensus of theories and values that guides the program; and (2) how to construct a theoretical framework that specifies the use of these measurements. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, History, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Farrar, Eleanor; House, Ernest R. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
The evaluators of Push/Excel assumed that it was a systematically developed program with measurable outcomes, not a charismatically inspired movement whose effects would be hard to pin down. As a result, neither the program nor the evaluation approach used were adequately tested. (Author)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Program Development, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weiss, Carol H. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
The promise of the stakeholder approach to evaluation lies in its potential to counter criticism that evaluation is too narrow, unrealistic in its standards for success, unfair to program staff and participants, and irrelevant to decision makers. (Author)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, History
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cohen, David K. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
Critiquing the stakeholder idea, the author states: if government chooses to take account of competing views in social program evaluation, it can get a better result if it encourages the competing views to find a voice of their own, not to speak through the government's chosen instrument. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Educational Policy, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stake, Robert E. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
Deliberately involving urban education stakeholders in the Cities-in-Schools evaluation study improved the utility of the findings for formative evaluation stakeholders but not for summative evaluation stakeholders. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Educational Researchers, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bryk, Anthony S.; Raudenbush, Stephen W. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
Stakeholder evaluation was designed to address widely recognized problems in the conduct of evaluation. However, global propositions about the problems and prospects of program evaluation obscure the circumstances in which social science can contribute to social problem solving. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Educational Policy, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods