Descriptor
Source
New Directions for Program… | 9 |
Author
Ball, Samuel | 1 |
Kaplan, Edward H. | 1 |
Kiresuk, Thomas J. | 1 |
Larson, Richard C. | 1 |
Levine, Victor | 1 |
Sechrest, Lee | 1 |
Stake, Robert E. | 1 |
Stalford, Charles | 1 |
Williams, David D. | 1 |
Yeaton, William E. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Evaluative | 7 |
Opinion Papers | 6 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Ball, Samuel – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
The variety of contexts, the politics of each situation, and the availability of resources all dictate variations in assessing outcomes. Seven major principles of program evaluation are considered, along with a cautionary note to the ambitious who expect large program effects. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrative Principles, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Summative Evaluation

Sechrest, Lee; Yeaton, William E. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
The assessment of the outcomes of social programs should always include estimates of the size of the effects produced. Various approaches to this problem are discussed. (Author)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation, Social Indicators

Levine, Victor – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
A program can be evaluated, and a cost-benefit ratio can be calculated to five decimal places, without ever directly examining outcomes. A useful vocabulary in economics and an understanding of the concepts involved is provided evaluators by an economist. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Decision Making, Human Services, Program Evaluation

New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
The ERS Standard for Program Evaluation encompass front-end analysis, evaluability assessment, formative evaluation, impact evaluation, program monitoring, and evaluation of evaluation. Written as simple admonitory statements, the Standards are organized into sections on formative and negotiation, structure and design, data collection and…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Data Collection, Disclosure, Evaluation Methods

Kiresuk, Thomas J.; And Others – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
The consumer of a service is of primary importance when defining groups most concerned with program impact. Program effectiveness for the consumer may be increased through the use of certain guiding principles based on the extension of existing quality assurance and program evaluation methodologies. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Accountability, Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods, Human Services

Larson, Richard C.; Kaplan, Edward H. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
Evaluation is discussed as an information-gathering process. Currently popular evaluation programs are reviewed in relation to decision making and various approaches that seem to contribute to the decision utility of evaluation (e.g. classical approaches, Bayesian approaches, adaptive designs, and model-based evaluations) are described. (Author/AL)
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation

Stake, Robert E. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
Deliberately involving urban education stakeholders in the Cities-in-Schools evaluation study improved the utility of the findings for formative evaluation stakeholders but not for summative evaluation stakeholders. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Educational Researchers, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization

Williams, David D. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
To judge the usefulness of the naturalistic method for any given evaluation circumstance, several questions about the situation should be answered. Sixteen questions, with sample answers regarding a recent evaluation situation, are presented to determine the utility of the naturalistic paradigm for a potential evaluation situation. (LMO)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation

Stalford, Charles – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
In one federally funded program, the third-party evaluator was under contract with the program evaluated and not the federal funding agency. The social structure of this arrangement has implications for information utilization. (Available from: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 433 California St., San Francisco, CA 94104, single issue, $6.95.) (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Agency Cooperation, Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators