Descriptor
Source
New Directions for Teaching… | 9 |
Author
Abrami, Philip C. | 1 |
Cashin, William E. | 1 |
Cohen, Peter A. | 1 |
Feldman, Kenneth A. | 1 |
Geis, George L. | 1 |
Gray, Peter J. | 1 |
Hanson, Gary R. | 1 |
Humphreys, W. Lee | 1 |
Huston, Christine | 1 |
Loacker, Georgine | 1 |
Pollio, Howard R. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Evaluative | 9 |
Opinion Papers | 4 |
Information Analyses | 3 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 2 |
Practitioners | 2 |
Teachers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Geis, George L. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991
Conditions that can enhance college teachers' acceptance and productive use of feedback about instruction are outlined, including understanding of the purposes of evaluation, who provides the feedback, the message itself (form, timing, sources, and subsequent messages), characteristics of the recipient, immediate environment, and consequences…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Communication (Thought Transfer), Faculty Evaluation

Gray, Peter J. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991
Assessment of college teaching is viewed broadly as the gathering of information for understanding and improving teaching as well as judging its quality. It is seen to play a crucial support role at each stage of instructional development: problem clarification, instructional design/redesign, and field testing and implementation. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Data Collection, Faculty Evaluation, Formative Evaluation

Loacker, Georgine – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1988
When faculty include assessment as part of the learning process, student learning and teaching are both enhanced. Faculty must integrate expected learning outcomes, assessment, and feedback mechanisms to clarify what should be taught, expectations of students, collaboration with other faculty, and evaluation quality to judge learning and teaching.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Cooperation, Educational Objectives

Pollio, Howard R.; Humphreys, W. Lee – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1988
Grades should be a way for teachers and students to communicate about student performance. Using grades to rank and sort is detrimental to learning and to the development of a stimulating and supportive academic climate. (Author)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, College Faculty, College Instruction, College Students

Cashin, William E. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1990
Research on variables that may bias student ratings of faculty have found them generally insignificant, but students do rate differently by academic field. The real problem arises from not knowing why this occurs. Institutions and individuals should decide how they will take these differences into consideration when interpreting student ratings.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Employment Practices

Hanson, Gary R.; Huston, Christine – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1995
Ways in which various student and program assessment tools can assist the academic advising function are discussed. Such tools include student test scores and interest assessments, analysis of advising interviews, administrative data on student progress and advising "flow," and student achievement measures. Information drawn from personal contact…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Advising, College Faculty, Faculty Advisers

Feldman, Kenneth A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996
Research on use of student evaluations of faculty as a source of information on good teaching is reviewed, and the differential importance of criteria expressed in the rating forms is discussed. It is concluded that while the data in the evaluations can have varied interpretations, they can also be an important source of information for…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Course Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria

Abrami, Philip C.; d'Apollonia, Sylvia – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1990
Multidimensional rating forms used for college student evaluation of faculty elicit information that can be used to evaluate the dimensions of instruction either separately or globally. Portions of the information may be useful for formative evaluation, but global items are best for making personnel decisions. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Educational Improvement, Employment Practices

Cohen, Peter A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1990
Evaluation research has established that college student ratings of faculty are reliable, valid, and widely used. However, resistance continues. Minimizing this resistance is crucial, and designating an influential change advocate within the institution can influence acceptance of a new system. Research on institutional contexts for evaluation…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Attitude Change, Change Strategies, College Faculty