Descriptor
| Educational Principles | 2 |
| Faculty Development | 2 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Teaching Models | 2 |
| Values | 2 |
| Educational Practices | 1 |
| Feedback | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
Source
| New Directions for Teaching… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBraskamp, Lawrence A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000
Braskamp uses four questions to focus his discussion on the improvement of faculty evaluation: (1) Why do we assess? (2) What are the standards and criteria of quality and effectiveness? (3) What do we assess? (4) How do we assess? (JM)
Descriptors: Educational Principles, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewedOry, John C. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000
Ory emphasizes four processes in assessing faculty: examining the craft of teaching; faculty members reflecting on the quality of and standards for their work; receiving feedback from others with the expectation that faculty will improve and assessing the work of others by focusing on the value of the work. (JM)
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Educational Principles, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
