Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| New Directions for Teaching… | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkSvinicki, Marilla D. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2017
As faculty and faculty developers, we sometimes forget that the principles of learning and motivation that we apply to students also apply to us. This chapter illustrates how the MVP model can be used to create effective faculty development activities.
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Educational Practices, Teaching Models, Learning Activities
Peer reviewedBraskamp, Lawrence A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000
Braskamp uses four questions to focus his discussion on the improvement of faculty evaluation: (1) Why do we assess? (2) What are the standards and criteria of quality and effectiveness? (3) What do we assess? (4) How do we assess? (JM)
Descriptors: Educational Principles, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewedOry, John C. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000
Ory emphasizes four processes in assessing faculty: examining the craft of teaching; faculty members reflecting on the quality of and standards for their work; receiving feedback from others with the expectation that faculty will improve and assessing the work of others by focusing on the value of the work. (JM)
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Educational Principles, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
