Descriptor
| College Faculty | 2 |
| Faculty Development | 2 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| College Instruction | 1 |
| Community Colleges | 1 |
| Consultants | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Faculty Promotion | 1 |
| Instructional Improvement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Directions for Teaching… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMcKeachie, W. J. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
Evaluation alone will probably not improve teaching, but, when it is accompanied by feedback, information about teaching and learning, and work with a knowledgeable consultant, evaluation may lead to improvement. An experienced consultant can foster trust, offer encouragement, and provide guided practice to help faculty improve their teaching…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Consultants, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedArreola, Raoul A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
A procedure for developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation program is described with examples of various components. Procedures for implementing such a program are discussed. Determining and weighting faculty roles, defining roles and gaining information, and arriving at a matrix are described. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
