Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Source
Performance Improvement | 24 |
Author
Anderson, Deborah | 1 |
Barritt, Chuck | 1 |
Benscoter, Bud | 1 |
Bunker, Ellen | 1 |
Chevalier, Roger | 1 |
Cole, David | 1 |
Deterline, William | 1 |
Forman, David C. | 1 |
Fritsch, Paula J. | 1 |
Gilmore, Erika R. | 1 |
Hanzel, Matthew | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 24 |
Reports - Descriptive | 22 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 6 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Stewart, Michelle Velez – Performance Improvement, 2012
Traditionally, learning is provided in a unidirectional manner from instructor to learner. This practice can be limiting to all individuals involved in the learning process. To develop quality instructional materials, the learning team can participate in instructional design and development (ID) as partners. This article discusses a proposed…
Descriptors: Instructional Design, Instructional Materials, Performance Technology, Communities of Practice
Anderson, Deborah – Performance Improvement, 2012
Instructional designers are at the forefront of many interactions both within an organization and client-facing. They are responsible for providing noteworthy learning experiences and ensuring the success of instructional programs. However, are instructional designers at a disadvantage because of a lack of interpersonal and building-relationships…
Descriptors: Instructional Design, Leadership, Interpersonal Competence, Interpersonal Relationship
Solomonson, William L. – Performance Improvement, 2008
The instructional designer faces the dual task of driving the instructional design process while managing a positive relationship with the subject matter expert. It is this latter task of relationship management that is often overlooked in practice and research in the field of human performance technology. (Contains 4 tables and 1 figure.)
Descriptors: Instructional Design, Performance Technology, Evaluation
Phillips, Jennie – Performance Improvement, 2010
Most organizations focus on one-off training solutions to address a single workplace learning need at a single time rather than integrating learning and nonlearning interventions to help staff develop increasingly complex levels of expertise specific to their jobs. Curriculum is a long-term, integrated approach to training in which workers take…
Descriptors: Curriculum Design, Education Work Relationship, Instructional Design, Change Strategies
Ruark, Benjamin E. – Performance Improvement, 2008
An evidence-based practice (EBP) model is proposed to replace the more-art-than-science "rope bridge" currently spanning the defining space of a training need and the designing space of a training curriculum. The rope bridge analogy symbolizes a way to address perceived deficiencies and research gaps in the…
Descriptors: Instructional Design, Evaluation, Performance Technology, Behavior Change
Jang, Hwan Young – Performance Improvement, 2008
This article discusses three perceived challenges in the field of human performance technology: a missing link from training to performance, limitations in gap analysis and cause analysis, and a lack of attention to business and organization performance. It then provides possible alternatives for each issue, such as instructional system…
Descriptors: Performance Technology, Instructional Design, Formative Evaluation, Summative Evaluation
Nguyen, Frank; Hanzel, Matthew – Performance Improvement, 2007
Those involved in training know that creating instructional materials can become a tedious, repetitive process. They also know that business conditions often require training interventions to be delivered in ways that are not ideally structured or timed. This article examines the notion that learning objects can be reused and adapted for…
Descriptors: Instructional Materials, Job Performance, Performance Technology, Case Studies

Hybert, Peter R. – Performance Improvement, 2001
Examines instructional systems design in light of training and performance technology. Topics include the nature of design; categories of stakeholders; three levels of instructional systems design, including Curriculum Architecture Design, instructional process design, and user interface/instructional activity design; and design goals. (LRW)
Descriptors: Instructional Design, Performance Technology, Stakeholders, Training Methods

Hughes, Michael – Performance Improvement, 2003
Describes a systematic approach for the design of training that supports large software implementation projects. Addresses the diverse combination of users, with different needs and time requirements, and outlines how a systematic design approach can be applied to the design and delivery of complex training solutions related to performance…
Descriptors: Instructional Design, Performance Technology, Systems Approach, Training Methods

Barritt, Chuck – Performance Improvement, 2002
Presents aspects of the traditional ISD (Instructional Systems Design) process that may change when moving a learning object strategy. Compares a traditional ISD process to a process that has been customized to fit the design, development, implementation, and evaluation of learning objects, regardless of how they are used as a performance…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Instructional Design, Learning Strategies, Performance Technology

Jonassen, David – Performance Improvement, 2001
Discusses problem solving and why employees need to be trained and educated to solve problems. Highlights include domain knowledge and its role in problem solving; instructional design issues; types of problems; discrete problems versus metaproblems; and the need to prescribe instructional design processes for each type of problem. (LRW)
Descriptors: Instructional Design, Job Performance, Performance Technology, Problem Solving

Rowley, Kurt; Bunker, Ellen; Cole, David – Performance Improvement, 2002
Describes two decisions in the development of effective blended instruction: selecting the instructional approach and selecting the development approach. Examines a successful training design and development case at a military continuing education college and analyzes it as an application of a blended onsite-online approach to human performance…
Descriptors: Continuing Education, Conventional Instruction, Instructional Design, Military Training

Rohrer-Murphy, Lucia; Moller, Leslie; Benscoter, Bud – Performance Improvement, 1997
Discusses the evaluation component of instructional design, suggests a performance technology approach to improve evaluation, and describes the Rummler-Brache Organizational Alignment Model that provides guidelines for systematically identifying the key variables when reorganizing training toward more appropriate evaluation. (LRW)
Descriptors: Educational Improvement, Evaluation Methods, Guidelines, Instructional Design

Mager, Eileen W. – Performance Improvement, 2000
Examines the critical components of effective "practice" in the fields of instructional technology and human performance technology, as well as barriers to successful practice. Describes how to cope with these obstacles and ensure inclusion of relevant practice in instructional programs. Concludes with a true story that illustrates how…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Instructional Design, Instructional Development, Instructional Effectiveness

Langdon, Danny G. – Performance Improvement, 1997
Describes a systematic approach to selecting instructional designs, discussing performance analysis, gaps, elements (inputs, conditions, process, outputs, consequences, feedback), matrices, changes in performance state (establishing, improving, maintaining, and extinguishing performance), intervention interference, and involving others in…
Descriptors: Construction Management, Engineers, Instructional Design, Intervention
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2