Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Phi Delta Kappan | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bo Yan; Thomas Aberli – Phi Delta Kappan, 2024
The annual budgeting process is a valuable opportunity for districts to systematically examine both resource use and programming. They can then use the findings to optimize resource use and improve program efficacy in ways that will lead to increased student achievement. Bo Yan and Thomas Aberli discuss three root causes for districts' inability…
Descriptors: Budgeting, School Districts, Resource Allocation, Expenditures
Frase, Larry E.; And Others – Phi Delta Kappan, 1982
Describes the implementation and evaluation of a program rewarding good teaching in the Catalina Foothills School District in Tucson (Arizona). Based on motivation-hygiene theory, which claims that money is not a motivator, the program funds teacher attendance at conferences and purchases of instructional equipment rather than teacher pay…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Incentives, Program Evaluation, Program Implementation
Bracey, Gerald W. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1996
Research suggests that children living in poverty show progressively lower test scores as they age. The Abecedarian research project contrasted a birth-to-age-five intervention program with a school-grade intervention program. When given IQ and achievement tests at various ages, children who had received preschool treatment consistently outscored…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Early Intervention, Economically Disadvantaged, Elementary Education
Levin, Henry M.; And Others – Phi Delta Kappan, 1986
Responding to a critique of their earlier article, authors Levin and Meister, joined by Glass, attempt to clarify some of the issues and to correct implicit misunderstandings in the critique, while detailing the application of cost-effectiveness to educational interventions. Twenty footnotes are appended. (IW)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Cost Effectiveness, Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education