Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Interrater Reliability | 6 |
Test Validity | 6 |
Meta Analysis | 4 |
Test Use | 3 |
Test Reliability | 2 |
Adults | 1 |
Attachment Behavior | 1 |
Coding | 1 |
Content Analysis | 1 |
Difficulty Level | 1 |
Effect Size | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Psychological Assessment | 6 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Information Analyses | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Rorschach Test | 3 |
Adult Attachment Interview | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Soilevuo Gronnerod, Jarna; Gronnerod, Cato – Psychological Assessment, 2012
All available studies on the Wartegg Zeichen Test (WZT; Wartegg, 1939) were collected and evaluated through a literature overview and a meta-analysis. The literature overview shows that the history of the WZT reflects the geographical and language-based processes of marginalization where relatively isolated traditions have lived and vanished in…
Descriptors: Personality Measures, Meta Analysis, Literature Reviews, Test Reliability
Taubner, Svenja; Horz, Susanne; Fischer-Kern, Melitta; Doering, Stephan; Buchheim, Anna; Zimmermann, Johannes – Psychological Assessment, 2013
The Reflective Functioning Scale (RFS) was developed to assess individual differences in the ability to mentalize attachment relationships. The RFS assesses mentalization from transcripts of the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI). A global score is given by trained coders on an 11-point scale ranging from antireflective to exceptionally reflective.…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Attachment Behavior, Individual Differences, Adults

Meyer, Gregory J. – Psychological Assessment, 1997
In reply to criticism of the Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) by J. Wood, M. Nezworski, and W. Stejskal (1996), this article presents a meta-analysis of published data indicating that the CS has excellent chance-corrected interrater reliability. It is noted that the erroneous assumptions of Wood et al. make their assertions about validity…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Meta Analysis, Test Use, Test Validity

Wood, James M.; Nezworski, M. Teresa; Stejskal, William J. – Psychological Assessment, 1997
G. Meyer (1997) attempts to refute the present authors' criticisms of the interrater reliability of the Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) but misrepresents their position and offers a flawed meta-analysis in support of his own. Rorschach proponents need to undertake high-quality replicated studies of CS reliability and validity. (SLD)
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Meta Analysis, Test Use, Test Validity

Meyer, Gregory J. – Psychological Assessment, 1997
Replies to Wood et al. and documents limitations of their conclusions about the Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS), supporting Meyer's own meta-analysis, which finds adequate interrater reliability for the CS. (SLD)
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Meta Analysis, Test Use, Test Validity
Linehan, Marsha M.; Comtois, Katherine Anne; Brown, Milton Z.; Heard, Heidi L.; Wagner, Amy – Psychological Assessment, 2006
The authors describe the development of the Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Interview (SASII), an instrument designed to assess the factors involved in nonfatal suicide attempts and intentional self-injury. Using 4 cohorts of participants, authors generated SASII items and evaluated them with factor and content analyses and internal consistency…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Suicide, Evaluation Methods, Self Destructive Behavior