Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 14 |
Descriptor
Source
Psychological Methods | 20 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 20 |
Reports - Descriptive | 20 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Netherlands | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Brandmaier, Andreas M.; von Oertzen, Timo; McArdle, John J.; Lindenberger, Ulman – Psychological Methods, 2013
In the behavioral and social sciences, structural equation models (SEMs) have become widely accepted as a modeling tool for the relation between latent and observed variables. SEMs can be seen as a unification of several multivariate analysis techniques. SEM Trees combine the strengths of SEMs and the decision tree paradigm by building tree…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Multivariate Analysis, Computation, Factor Analysis
Li, Libo; Bentler, Peter M. – Psychological Methods, 2011
MacCallum, Browne, and Cai (2006) proposed a new framework for evaluation and power analysis of small differences between nested structural equation models (SEMs). In their framework, the null and alternative hypotheses for testing a small difference in fit and its related power analyses were defined by some chosen root-mean-square error of…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Bollen, Kenneth A.; Bauldry, Shawn – Psychological Methods, 2011
In the last 2 decades attention to causal (and formative) indicators has grown. Accompanying this growth has been the belief that one can classify indicators into 2 categories: effect (reflective) indicators and causal (formative) indicators. We argue that the dichotomous view is too simple. Instead, there are effect indicators and 3 types of…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Computation, Structural Equation Models, Expertise
Culpepper, Steven Andrew; Aguinis, Herman – Psychological Methods, 2011
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is used widely in psychological research implementing nonexperimental designs. However, when covariates are fallible (i.e., measured with error), which is the norm, researchers must choose from among 3 inadequate courses of action: (a) know that the assumption that covariates are perfectly reliable is violated but…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Error of Measurement, Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models
Macho, Siegfried; Ledermann, Thomas – Psychological Methods, 2011
The phantom model approach for estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects within structural equation models (SEMs) is presented. The rationale underlying this novel method consists in representing the specific effect to be assessed as a total effect within a separate latent variable model, the phantom model that is added to the main…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis, Sampling
Lai, Keke; Kelley, Ken – Psychological Methods, 2011
In addition to evaluating a structural equation model (SEM) as a whole, often the model parameters are of interest and confidence intervals for those parameters are formed. Given a model with a good overall fit, it is entirely possible for the targeted effects of interest to have very wide confidence intervals, thus giving little information about…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Structural Equation Models, Computation, Sample Size
Tucker-Drob, Elliot M. – Psychological Methods, 2011
Experiments allow researchers to randomly vary the key manipulation, the instruments of measurement, and the sequences of the measurements and manipulations across participants. To date, however, the advantages of randomized experiments to manipulate both the aspects of interest and the aspects that threaten internal validity have been primarily…
Descriptors: Experiments, Research Design, Inferences, Individual Differences
Enders, Craig K. – Psychological Methods, 2011
The past decade has seen a noticeable shift in missing data handling techniques that assume a missing at random (MAR) mechanism, where the propensity for missing data on an outcome is related to other analysis variables. Although MAR is often reasonable, there are situations where this assumption is unlikely to hold, leading to biased parameter…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Social Sciences, Data, Attrition (Research Studies)
Muthen, Bengt; Asparouhov, Tihomir – Psychological Methods, 2012
This article proposes a new approach to factor analysis and structural equation modeling using Bayesian analysis. The new approach replaces parameter specifications of exact zeros with approximate zeros based on informative, small-variance priors. It is argued that this produces an analysis that better reflects substantive theories. The proposed…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Cognitive Ability, Science Achievement, Structural Equation Models
Geiser, Christian; Eid, Michael; Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. – Psychological Methods, 2008
In a recent article, A. Maydeu-Olivares and D. L. Coffman (2006, see EJ751121) presented a random intercept factor approach for modeling idiosyncratic response styles in questionnaire data and compared this approach with competing confirmatory factor analysis models. Among the competing models was the CT-C(M-1) model (M. Eid, 2000). In an…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Questionnaires
Gonzalez, Jorge; De Boeck, Paul; Tuerlinckx, Francis – Psychological Methods, 2008
Structural equation models are commonly used to analyze 2-mode data sets, in which a set of objects is measured on a set of variables. The underlying structure within the object mode is evaluated using latent variables, which are measured by indicators coming from the variable mode. Additionally, when the objects are measured under different…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Models
Curran, Patrick J.; Bauer, Daniel J. – Psychological Methods, 2007
Multilevel models have come to play an increasingly important role in many areas of social science research. However, in contrast to other modeling strategies, there is currently no widely used approach for graphically diagramming multilevel models. Ideally, such diagrams would serve two functions: to provide a formal structure for deriving the…
Descriptors: Equations (Mathematics), Social Science Research, Social Sciences, Mathematical Models
Olsen, Joseph A.; Kenny, David A. – Psychological Methods, 2006
Structural equation modeling (SEM) can be adapted in a relatively straightforward fashion to analyze data from interchangeable dyads (i.e., dyads in which the 2 members cannot be differentiated). The authors describe a general strategy for SEM model estimation, comparison, and fit assessment that can be used with either dyad-level or pairwise…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Data Analysis, Models, Factor Analysis
Mehta, Paras D.; Neale, Michael C.; Flay, Brian R. – Psychological Methods, 2004
A didactic on latent growth curve modeling for ordinal outcomes is presented. The conceptual aspects of modeling growth with ordinal variables and the notion of threshold invariance are illustrated graphically using a hypothetical example. The ordinal growth model is described in terms of 3 nested models: (a) multivariate normality of the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Intervals, Multivariate Analysis
Marsh, Herbert W.; Wen, Zhonglin; Hau, Kit-Tai – Psychological Methods, 2004
Interactions between (multiple indicator) latent variables are rarely used because of implementation complexity and competing strategies. Based on 4 simulation studies, the traditional constrained approach performed more poorly than did 3 new approaches-unconstrained, generalized appended product indicator, and quasi-maximum-likelihood (QML). The…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Item Analysis, Error Patterns, Computation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2