Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 15 |
Descriptor
Source
Psychological Methods | 17 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 17 |
Reports - Evaluative | 17 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Voelkle, Manuel C.; Oud, Johan H. L.; Davidov, Eldad; Schmidt, Peter – Psychological Methods, 2012
Panel studies, in which the same subjects are repeatedly observed at multiple time points, are among the most popular longitudinal designs in psychology. Meanwhile, there exists a wide range of different methods to analyze such data, with autoregressive and cross-lagged models being 2 of the most well known representatives. Unfortunately, in these…
Descriptors: Authoritarianism, Intervals, Structural Equation Models, Correlation
Heene, Moritz; Hilbert, Sven; Draxler, Clemens; Ziegler, Matthias; Buhner, Markus – Psychological Methods, 2011
Fit indices are widely used in order to test the model fit for structural equation models. In a highly influential study, Hu and Bentler (1999) showed that certain cutoff values for these indices could be derived, which, over time, has led to the reification of these suggested thresholds as "golden rules" for establishing the fit or other aspects…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis
Yuan, Ke-Hai; Hayashi, Kentaro – Psychological Methods, 2010
This article introduces two simple scatter plots for model diagnosis in structural equation modeling. One plot contrasts a residual-based M-distance of the structural model with the M-distance for the factor score. It contains information on outliers, good leverage observations, bad leverage observations, and normal cases. The other plot contrasts…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Data Analysis, Visual Aids
Preacher, Kristopher J.; Zyphur, Michael J.; Zhang, Zhen – Psychological Methods, 2010
Several methods for testing mediation hypotheses with 2-level nested data have been proposed by researchers using a multilevel modeling (MLM) paradigm. However, these MLM approaches do not accommodate mediation pathways with Level-2 outcomes and may produce conflated estimates of between- and within-level components of indirect effects. Moreover,…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Hypothesis Testing, Statistical Analysis, Predictor Variables
McGrath, Robert E.; Walters, Glenn D. – Psychological Methods, 2012
Statistical analyses investigating latent structure can be divided into those that estimate structural model parameters and those that detect the structural model type. The most basic distinction among structure types is between categorical (discrete) and dimensional (continuous) models. It is a common, and potentially misleading, practice to…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Computation
Imai, Kosuke; Keele, Luke; Tingley, Dustin – Psychological Methods, 2010
Traditionally in the social sciences, causal mediation analysis has been formulated, understood, and implemented within the framework of linear structural equation models. We argue and demonstrate that this is problematic for 3 reasons: the lack of a general definition of causal mediation effects independent of a particular statistical model, the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis, Statistical Inference, Intervention
Savalei, Victoria – Psychological Methods, 2010
Maximum likelihood is the most common estimation method in structural equation modeling. Standard errors for maximum likelihood estimates are obtained from the associated information matrix, which can be estimated from the sample using either expected or observed information. It is known that, with complete data, estimates based on observed or…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Error of Measurement, Data
Harring, Jeffrey R.; Weiss, Brandi A.; Hsu, Jui-Chen – Psychological Methods, 2012
Two Monte Carlo simulations were performed to compare methods for estimating and testing hypotheses of quadratic effects in latent variable regression models. The methods considered in the current study were (a) a 2-stage moderated regression approach using latent variable scores, (b) an unconstrained product indicator approach, (c) a latent…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Geometric Concepts, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Keselman, H. J.; Miller, Charles W.; Holland, Burt – Psychological Methods, 2011
There have been many discussions of how Type I errors should be controlled when many hypotheses are tested (e.g., all possible comparisons of means, correlations, proportions, the coefficients in hierarchical models, etc.). By and large, researchers have adopted familywise (FWER) control, though this practice certainly is not universal. Familywise…
Descriptors: Validity, Statistical Significance, Probability, Computation
Muthen, Bengt; Asparouhov, Tihomir; Hunter, Aimee M.; Leuchter, Andrew F. – Psychological Methods, 2011
This article uses a general latent variable framework to study a series of models for nonignorable missingness due to dropout. Nonignorable missing data modeling acknowledges that missingness may depend not only on covariates and observed outcomes at previous time points as with the standard missing at random assumption, but also on latent…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Depression (Psychology), Models, Trend Analysis
Savalei, Victoria; Kolenikov, Stanislav – Psychological Methods, 2008
Recently, R. D. Stoel, F. G. Garre, C. Dolan, and G. van den Wittenboer (2006) reviewed approaches for obtaining reference mixture distributions for difference tests when a parameter is on the boundary. The authors of the present study argue that this methodology is incomplete without a discussion of when the mixtures are needed and show that they…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Evaluation Methods, Statistical Analysis
Jo, Booil – Psychological Methods, 2008
This article links the structural equation modeling (SEM) approach with the principal stratification (PS) approach, both of which have been widely used to study the role of intermediate posttreatment outcomes in randomized experiments. Despite the potential benefit of such integration, the 2 approaches have been developed in parallel with little…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Monte Carlo Methods, Inferences, Outcomes of Treatment
Edwards, Jeffrey R.; Lambert, Lisa Schurer – Psychological Methods, 2007
Studies that combine moderation and mediation are prevalent in basic and applied psychology research. Typically, these studies are framed in terms of moderated mediation or mediated moderation, both of which involve similar analytical approaches. Unfortunately, these approaches have important shortcomings that conceal the nature of the moderated…
Descriptors: Path Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Psychological Studies, Research Methodology
Wirth, R. J.; Edwards, Michael C. – Psychological Methods, 2007
The rationale underlying factor analysis applies to continuous and categorical variables alike; however, the models and estimation methods for continuous (i.e., interval or ratio scale) data are not appropriate for item-level data that are categorical in nature. The authors provide a targeted review and synthesis of the item factor analysis (IFA)…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Markov Processes, Item Response Theory, Factor Analysis
Courvoisier, Delphine S.; Eid, Michael; Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. – Psychological Methods, 2007
Extensions of latent state-trait models for continuous observed variables to mixture latent state-trait models with and without covariates of change are presented that can separate individuals differing in their occasion-specific variability. An empirical application to the repeated measurement of mood states (N = 501) revealed that a model with 2…
Descriptors: Psychological Patterns, Simulation, Structural Equation Models, Sample Size
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2