NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Macho, Siegfried; Ledermann, Thomas – Psychological Methods, 2011
The phantom model approach for estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects within structural equation models (SEMs) is presented. The rationale underlying this novel method consists in representing the specific effect to be assessed as a total effect within a separate latent variable model, the phantom model that is added to the main…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bird, Kevin D. – Psychological Methods, 2011
Any set of confidence interval inferences on J - 1 linearly independent contrasts on J means, such as the two comparisons [mu][subscript 1] - [mu][subscript 2] and [mu][subscript 2] - [mu][subscript 3] on 3 means, provides a basis for the deduction of interval inferences on all other contrasts, such as the redundant comparison [mu][subscript 1] -…
Descriptors: Intervals, Statistical Analysis, Inferences, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shadish, William R. – Psychological Methods, 2010
This article compares Donald Campbell's and Donald Rubin's work on causal inference in field settings on issues of epistemology, theories of cause and effect, methodology, statistics, generalization, and terminology. The two approaches are quite different but compatible, differing mostly in matters of bandwidth versus fidelity. Campbell's work…
Descriptors: Inferences, Generalization, Epistemology, Causal Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cook, Thomas D.; Steiner, Peter M. – Psychological Methods, 2010
In this article, we note the many ontological, epistemological, and methodological similarities between how Campbell and Rubin conceptualize causation. We then explore 3 differences in their written emphases about individual case matching in observational studies. We contend that (a) Campbell places greater emphasis than Rubin on the special role…
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Pretests Posttests, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cooper, Harris; Patall, Erika A. – Psychological Methods, 2009
The authors describe the relative benefits of conducting meta-analyses with (a) individual participant data (IPD) gathered from the constituent studies and (b) aggregated data (AD), or the group-level statistics (in particular, effect sizes) that appear in reports of a study's results. Given that both IPD and AD are equally available,…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Meta Analysis, Databases, Coordination
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bird, Kevin D.; Hadzi-Pavlovic, Dusan – Psychological Methods, 2005
The authors provide generalizations of R. J. Boik's (1993) studentized maximum root (SMR) procedure that allow for simultaneous inference on families of product contrasts including simple effect contrasts and differences among simple effect contrasts in coherent analyses of data from 2-factor fixed-effects designs. Unlike the F-based simultaneous…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Statistical Inference, Effect Size, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stern, Hal S. – Psychological Methods, 2005
I. Klugkist, O. Laudy, and H. Hoijtink (2005) presented a Bayesian approach to analysis of variance models with inequality constraints. Constraints may play 2 distinct roles in data analysis. They may represent prior information that allows more precise inferences regarding parameter values, or they may describe a theory to be judged against the…
Descriptors: Probability, Inferences, Bayesian Statistics, Data Analysis