NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)2
Source
Psychological Methods3
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bonnett, Douglas G. – Psychological Methods, 2008
Most psychology journals now require authors to report a sample value of effect size along with hypothesis testing results. The sample effect size value can be misleading because it contains sampling error. Authors often incorrectly interpret the sample effect size as if it were the population effect size. A simple solution to this problem is to…
Descriptors: Intervals, Hypothesis Testing, Effect Size, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Keselman, H. J.; Algina, James; Lix, Lisa M.; Wilcox, Rand R.; Deering, Kathleen N. – Psychological Methods, 2008
Standard least squares analysis of variance methods suffer from poor power under arbitrarily small departures from normality and fail to control the probability of a Type I error when standard assumptions are violated. This article describes a framework for robust estimation and testing that uses trimmed means with an approximate degrees of…
Descriptors: Intervals, Testing, Least Squares Statistics, Effect Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hsu, Louis M. – Psychological Methods, 2005
One version of r-sub(equivalent), calculated from Fisher's exact test p values and recommended for small samples, is considered "a more realistic... [and] a more accurate estimate of the population correlation than... the sample correlation, r-sub(sample)" (R. Rosenthal & D. B. Rubin, 2003, p. 494). Small sample properties of r-sub(sample) and of…
Descriptors: Correlation, Meta Analysis, Error of Measurement, Effect Size