Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Effect Size | 6 |
Sampling | 6 |
Intervals | 3 |
Meta Analysis | 3 |
Research Methodology | 3 |
Statistical Analysis | 3 |
Hypothesis Testing | 2 |
Monte Carlo Methods | 2 |
Probability | 2 |
Statistical Significance | 2 |
Case Studies | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Psychological Methods | 6 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Manolov, Rumen; Solanas, Antonio – Psychological Methods, 2012
There is currently a considerable diversity of quantitative measures available for summarizing the results in single-case studies. Given that the interpretation of some of them is difficult due to the lack of established benchmarks, the current article proposes an approach for obtaining further numerical evidence on the importance of the results,…
Descriptors: Sampling, Probability, Statistical Significance, Case Studies
Sanchez-Meca, Julio; Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio – Psychological Methods, 2008
One of the main objectives in meta-analysis is to estimate the overall effect size by calculating a confidence interval (CI). The usual procedure consists of assuming a standard normal distribution and a sampling variance defined as the inverse of the sum of the estimated weights of the effect sizes. But this procedure does not take into account…
Descriptors: Intervals, Monte Carlo Methods, Meta Analysis, Effect Size
Bonnett, Douglas G. – Psychological Methods, 2008
Most psychology journals now require authors to report a sample value of effect size along with hypothesis testing results. The sample effect size value can be misleading because it contains sampling error. Authors often incorrectly interpret the sample effect size as if it were the population effect size. A simple solution to this problem is to…
Descriptors: Intervals, Hypothesis Testing, Effect Size, Sampling
Zou, Guang Yong – Psychological Methods, 2007
Confidence intervals are widely accepted as a preferred way to present study results. They encompass significance tests and provide an estimate of the magnitude of the effect. However, comparisons of correlations still rely heavily on significance testing. The persistence of this practice is caused primarily by the lack of simple yet accurate…
Descriptors: Intervals, Effect Size, Research Methodology, Correlation
Valentine, Jeffrey C.; McHugh, Cathleen M. – Psychological Methods, 2007
Using meta-analysis, randomized experiments in education that either clearly did or clearly did not experience student attrition were examined for the baseline comparability of groups. Results from 35 studies suggested that after attrition, the observed measures of baseline comparability of groups did not differ more than would be expected given…
Descriptors: Sampling, Effect Size, Student Attrition, Educational Research
Preacher, Kristopher J.; Rucker, Derek D.; MacCallum, Robert C.; Nicewander, W. Alan – Psychological Methods, 2005
Analysis of continuous variables sometimes proceeds by selecting individuals on the basis of extreme scores of a sample distribution and submitting only those extreme scores to further analysis. This sampling method is known as the extreme groups approach (EGA). EGA is often used to achieve greater statistical power in subsequent hypothesis tests.…
Descriptors: Sampling, Statistical Analysis, Reliability, Measures (Individuals)