Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
| Psychological Methods | 6 |
Author
| Buhner, Markus | 1 |
| Cai, Li | 1 |
| Draxler, Clemens | 1 |
| Edwards, Michael C. | 1 |
| Eid, Michael | 1 |
| Geiser, Christian | 1 |
| Heene, Moritz | 1 |
| Hilbert, Sven | 1 |
| Kolenikov, Stanislav | 1 |
| MacCallum, Robert C. | 1 |
| Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHeene, Moritz; Hilbert, Sven; Draxler, Clemens; Ziegler, Matthias; Buhner, Markus – Psychological Methods, 2011
Fit indices are widely used in order to test the model fit for structural equation models. In a highly influential study, Hu and Bentler (1999) showed that certain cutoff values for these indices could be derived, which, over time, has led to the reification of these suggested thresholds as "golden rules" for establishing the fit or other aspects…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis
Rindskopf, David – Psychological Methods, 2012
Muthen and Asparouhov (2012) made a strong case for the advantages of Bayesian methodology in factor analysis and structural equation models. I show additional extensions and adaptations of their methods and show how non-Bayesians can take advantage of many (though not all) of these advantages by using interval restrictions on parameters. By…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Factor Analysis, Computation
MacCallum, Robert C.; Edwards, Michael C.; Cai, Li – Psychological Methods, 2012
Muthen and Asparouhov (2012) have proposed and demonstrated an approach to model specification and estimation in structural equation modeling (SEM) using Bayesian methods. Their contribution builds on previous work in this area by (a) focusing on the translation of conventional SEM models into a Bayesian framework wherein parameters fixed at zero…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Computation, Expertise
Evaluating Model Fit for Growth Curve Models: Integration of Fit Indices from SEM and MLM Frameworks
Wu, Wei; West, Stephen G.; Taylor, Aaron B. – Psychological Methods, 2009
Evaluating overall model fit for growth curve models involves 3 challenging issues. (a) Three types of longitudinal data with different implications for model fit may be distinguished: balanced on time with complete data, balanced on time with data missing at random, and unbalanced on time. (b) Traditional work on fit from the structural equation…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Longitudinal Studies, Comparative Analysis
Savalei, Victoria; Kolenikov, Stanislav – Psychological Methods, 2008
Recently, R. D. Stoel, F. G. Garre, C. Dolan, and G. van den Wittenboer (2006) reviewed approaches for obtaining reference mixture distributions for difference tests when a parameter is on the boundary. The authors of the present study argue that this methodology is incomplete without a discussion of when the mixtures are needed and show that they…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Evaluation Methods, Statistical Analysis
Geiser, Christian; Eid, Michael; Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. – Psychological Methods, 2008
In a recent article, A. Maydeu-Olivares and D. L. Coffman (2006, see EJ751121) presented a random intercept factor approach for modeling idiosyncratic response styles in questionnaire data and compared this approach with competing confirmatory factor analysis models. Among the competing models was the CT-C(M-1) model (M. Eid, 2000). In an…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Questionnaires
