NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bonnett, Douglas G. – Psychological Methods, 2008
Most psychology journals now require authors to report a sample value of effect size along with hypothesis testing results. The sample effect size value can be misleading because it contains sampling error. Authors often incorrectly interpret the sample effect size as if it were the population effect size. A simple solution to this problem is to…
Descriptors: Intervals, Hypothesis Testing, Effect Size, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Preacher, Kristopher J.; Rucker, Derek D.; MacCallum, Robert C.; Nicewander, W. Alan – Psychological Methods, 2005
Analysis of continuous variables sometimes proceeds by selecting individuals on the basis of extreme scores of a sample distribution and submitting only those extreme scores to further analysis. This sampling method is known as the extreme groups approach (EGA). EGA is often used to achieve greater statistical power in subsequent hypothesis tests.…
Descriptors: Sampling, Statistical Analysis, Reliability, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Long, Jeffrey D. – Psychological Methods, 2005
Often quantitative data in the social sciences have only ordinal justification. Problems of interpretation can arise when least squares multiple regression (LSMR) is used with ordinal data. Two ordinal alternatives are discussed, dominance-based ordinal multiple regression (DOMR) and proportional odds multiple regression. The Q[superscript 2]…
Descriptors: Simulation, Social Science Research, Error of Measurement, Least Squares Statistics