NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)3
Source
Psychological Methods3
Education Level
Audience
Researchers1
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tonidandel, Scott; LeBreton, James M.; Johnson, Jeff W. – Psychological Methods, 2009
Relative weight analysis is a procedure for estimating the relative importance of correlated predictors in a regression equation. Because the sampling distribution of relative weights is unknown, researchers using relative weight analysis are unable to make judgments regarding the statistical significance of the relative weights. J. W. Johnson…
Descriptors: Multiple Regression Analysis, Statistical Significance, Statistical Inference, Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sanchez-Meca, Julio; Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio – Psychological Methods, 2008
One of the main objectives in meta-analysis is to estimate the overall effect size by calculating a confidence interval (CI). The usual procedure consists of assuming a standard normal distribution and a sampling variance defined as the inverse of the sum of the estimated weights of the effect sizes. But this procedure does not take into account…
Descriptors: Intervals, Monte Carlo Methods, Meta Analysis, Effect Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bonnett, Douglas G. – Psychological Methods, 2008
Most psychology journals now require authors to report a sample value of effect size along with hypothesis testing results. The sample effect size value can be misleading because it contains sampling error. Authors often incorrectly interpret the sample effect size as if it were the population effect size. A simple solution to this problem is to…
Descriptors: Intervals, Hypothesis Testing, Effect Size, Sampling