Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Error of Measurement | 4 |
Sampling | 4 |
Simulation | 3 |
Context Effect | 2 |
Correlation | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Hypothesis Testing | 2 |
Statistical Analysis | 2 |
Classification | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Data Interpretation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Psychological Methods | 4 |
Author
Ludtke, Oliver | 2 |
Marsh, Herbert W. | 2 |
Robitzsch, Alexander | 2 |
Trautwein, Ulrich | 2 |
Asparouhov, Tihomir | 1 |
Bonnett, Douglas G. | 1 |
Long, Jeffrey D. | 1 |
Muthen, Bengt | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ludtke, Oliver; Marsh, Herbert W.; Robitzsch, Alexander; Trautwein, Ulrich – Psychological Methods, 2011
In multilevel modeling, group-level variables (L2) for assessing contextual effects are frequently generated by aggregating variables from a lower level (L1). A major problem of contextual analyses in the social sciences is that there is no error-free measurement of constructs. In the present article, 2 types of error occurring in multilevel data…
Descriptors: Simulation, Educational Psychology, Social Sciences, Measurement
Ludtke, Oliver; Marsh, Herbert W.; Robitzsch, Alexander; Trautwein, Ulrich; Asparouhov, Tihomir; Muthen, Bengt – Psychological Methods, 2008
In multilevel modeling (MLM), group-level (L2) characteristics are often measured by aggregating individual-level (L1) characteristics within each group so as to assess contextual effects (e.g., group-average effects of socioeconomic status, achievement, climate). Most previous applications have used a multilevel manifest covariate (MMC) approach,…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Sampling, Context Effect, Simulation
Bonnett, Douglas G. – Psychological Methods, 2008
Most psychology journals now require authors to report a sample value of effect size along with hypothesis testing results. The sample effect size value can be misleading because it contains sampling error. Authors often incorrectly interpret the sample effect size as if it were the population effect size. A simple solution to this problem is to…
Descriptors: Intervals, Hypothesis Testing, Effect Size, Sampling
Long, Jeffrey D. – Psychological Methods, 2005
Often quantitative data in the social sciences have only ordinal justification. Problems of interpretation can arise when least squares multiple regression (LSMR) is used with ordinal data. Two ordinal alternatives are discussed, dominance-based ordinal multiple regression (DOMR) and proportional odds multiple regression. The Q[superscript 2]…
Descriptors: Simulation, Social Science Research, Error of Measurement, Least Squares Statistics