Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Heuristics | 6 |
Cognitive Processes | 4 |
Models | 4 |
Decision Making | 2 |
Goodness of Fit | 2 |
Prediction | 2 |
Probability | 2 |
Process Education | 2 |
Association (Psychology) | 1 |
Associative Learning | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Psychological Review | 6 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Opinion Papers | 6 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gigerenzer, Gerd; Hoffrage, Ulrich; Goldstein, Daniel G. – Psychological Review, 2008
M. R. Dougherty, A. M. Franco-Watkins, and R. Thomas (2008) conjectured that fast and frugal heuristics need an automatic frequency counter for ordering cues. In fact, only a few heuristics order cues, and these orderings can arise from evolutionary, social, or individual learning, none of which requires automatic frequency counting. The idea that…
Descriptors: Cues, Heuristics, Memory, Psychology
Johnson, Eric J.; Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael; Willemsen, Martijn C. – Psychological Review, 2008
Comments on the article by E. Brandstatter, G. Gigerenzer, and R. Hertwig (2006). Resolution of debates in cognition usually comes from the introduction of constraints in the form of new data about either the process or representation. Decision research, in contrast, has relied predominantly on testing models by examining their fit to choices. The…
Descriptors: Heuristics, Hypermedia, Probability, Decision Making
Birnbaum, Michael H. – Psychological Review, 2008
E. Brandstatter, G. Gigerenzer, and R. Hertwig (2006) contended that their priority heuristic, a type of lexicographic semiorder model, is more accurate than cumulative prospect theory (CPT) or transfer of attention exchange (TAX) models in describing risky decisions. However, there are 4 problems with their argument. First, their heuristic is not…
Descriptors: Heuristics, Prediction, Risk, Decision Making
Brandstatter, Eduard; Gigerenzer, Gerd; Hertwig, Ralph – Psychological Review, 2008
E. Brandstatter, G. Gigerenzer, and R. Hertwig (2006) showed that the priority heuristic matches or outperforms modifications of expected utility theory in predicting choice in 4 diverse problem sets. M. H. Birnbaum (2008) argued that sets exist in which the opposite is true. The authors agree--but stress that all choice strategies have regions of…
Descriptors: Conflict, Heuristics, Knowledge Base for Teaching, Problem Sets
Stewart, Neil – Psychological Review, 2007
N. Stewart, G. D. A. Brown, and N. Chater presented a relative judgment model (RJM) of absolute identification, in which the current stimulus is judged relative to the preceding stimulus. S. Brown, A. A. J. Marley, and Y. Lacouture found that the RJM does not predict their finding of increased accuracy after large stimulus jumps, except at the…
Descriptors: Identification, Goodness of Fit, Association (Psychology), Associative Learning

Tversky, Amos; Kahneman, Daniel – Psychological Review, 1983
Judgments under uncertainty are often mediated by intuitive heuristics that are not bound by the conjunction rule of probability. Representativeness and availability heuristics can make a conjunction appear more probable than one of its constituents. Alternative interpretations of this conjunction fallacy are discussed and attempts to combat it…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Error Patterns, Evaluative Thinking, Heuristics