NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)2
Since 2006 (last 20 years)5
Source
Psychology in the Schools26
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 26 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kaldenberg, Erica R.; Ganzeveld, Paula; Hosp, John L.; Rodgers, Derek B. – Psychology in the Schools, 2016
Twenty-three single-subject studies aimed at improving the writing achievement of students identified as having a learning disability were analyzed meta-analytically. The effect size phi was used to compare the writing strategies. The dependent measures used to assess the efficacy of the interventions were also coded and reviewed. Results suggest…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Intervention, Writing Achievement, Writing Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stevenson, Nathan A.; Reed, Deborah K.; Tighe, Elizabeth L. – Psychology in the Schools, 2016
To provide timely and effective supports for students reading below grade level, schools require methods for quickly and accurately identifying those students in need. One method for identifying those students is through universal screening. Assessments such as oral reading fluency (ORF) and Maze reading comprehension are commonly used as…
Descriptors: Special Education, Middle School Students, Socioeconomic Status, Oral Reading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hale, James B.; Fiorello, Catherine A.; Dumont, Ron; Willis, John O.; Rackley, Christopher; Elliott, Colin – Psychology in the Schools, 2008
Concerns about the ability-achievement discrepancy method for specific learning disability (SLD) determination led to alternative research-based methods, such as failure to respond to intervention. Neither of these "regulatory" methods address the "statutory" SLD definition, which explicitly includes a deficit in "basic…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Predictive Validity, Psychology, Mathematics Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dean, Vincent J.; Burns, Matthew K.; Grialou, Tina; Varro, Patrick J. – Psychology in the Schools, 2006
The purpose of this article is to examine models designed for the determination of a learning disability and compare them to specific criteria to determine whether the given diagnostic process is ecological in nature. The traditional child-centered deficit model (CCD), Relative Achievement Discrepancy model (RAD), and Responsiveness to…
Descriptors: Student Behavior, Validity, Disability Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mize, John M.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1979
This study suggests that the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and the Slosson Intelligence Test measure different and limited aspects of a child's ability and are only rough estimates of his/her capability of what is generally termed intelligence. Scores from either should be interpreted with care and in light of other information about a child.…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Analysis, Educational Diagnosis, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zimmerman, Irla Lee; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1986
Assessed the degree of comparability between the tests over time for two samples of referred adolescents of borderline intelligence. Results indicated that the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised significantly overestimated the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised by three to five points. Differences were most marked at the lower…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Comparative Analysis, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cordoni, Barbara K.; Snyder, Mary K. – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Learning disabled college students (N=16) were tested to compare the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) with the Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT). Significantly different scores are derived when WRAT norms are compared with PIAT norms, indicating that the tests are not interchangeable instruments for academic achievement. (RC)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, College Students, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGonagle, Bonnie – Psychology in the Schools, 1977
This study compared the three scales of the WISC and the WISC-R for degree of intercorrelation. Results included significant correlations in all cases, no systematic changes in variance, and significantly lower IQs on the WISC-R for all children in the sample, except the EMRs. (Author)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sattler, Jerome M.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1980
Results show that Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) IQs are not interchangeable with Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) IQs in a sample of reading disabled children. The PPVT yielded higher IQs on the average than did the WISC-R, supporting results obtained with learning disabled students. (Author/BEF)
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Analysis, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ysseldyke, James; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Compares the performance of learning disabled students on the WISC-R and the Tests of Cognitive Abilities from the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. This study finds that learning disabled subjects performed more poorly on the Tests of Cognitive Abilities than on the WISC-R. (Author)
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haddad, Frederick A. – Psychology in the Schools, 1986
Results of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) and Bender-Gestalt Test were compared for a sample of learning disabled children that included 24 blacks and 24 whites; mean age 9 years. A significant correlation coefficient was found between the K-ABC Simultaneous Scale and the Bender-Gestalt Test error score. Implications of these…
Descriptors: Black Students, Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Educational Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shaughnessy, Michael F.; Moore, Jack N. – Psychology in the Schools, 1994
Paper explores the use of an intelligence test in a southwestern university. Honor students performed significantly better than the average freshmen and the developmental/remedial students. Results suggest that developmental students lack specific cognitive abilities as well as some higher order thinking skills. Implications are discussed. (RJM)
Descriptors: Adolescents, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brenton, Beatrice White; Gilmore, Doug – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
An operational index of discrepancy to assist in identifying learning disabilities was derived using the Full Scale IQ, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, and relevant subtest scores on the Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Considerable caution should be exercised when classifying children, especially females, as learning disabled.…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Diagnostic Tests, Educational Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Teresa C.; Smith, Billy L. – Psychology in the Schools, 1986
WISC-R (Wechsler Intelligence Scale in Children-Revised) Verbal and Performance scores were correlated with WRAT-R Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised scores. The verbal score was found to predict reading, spelling, and arithmetic. The performance score did not add significantly to the predictions. Results were consistent with earlier studies.…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Teeter, Anne; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1982
Compared nonhandicapped (NH), educationally disadvantaged (ED), and learning disabled (LD) Navajo children on intellectual dimensions measured by the WISC-R. The ED and LD group means were similar on verbal measures, but the LD group scores were lower than ED group scores on performance measures. (Author/RC)
Descriptors: Adolescents, American Indians, Children, Comparative Analysis
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2