Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 8 |
Factor Analysis | 8 |
Factor Structure | 8 |
Models | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Matrices | 2 |
Oblique Rotation | 2 |
Transformations (Mathematics) | 2 |
Algorithms | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Psychometrika | 8 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jennrich, Robert I.; Bentler, Peter M. – Psychometrika, 2012
Bi-factor analysis is a form of confirmatory factor analysis originally introduced by Holzinger and Swineford ("Psychometrika" 47:41-54, 1937). The bi-factor model has a general factor, a number of group factors, and an explicit bi-factor structure. Jennrich and Bentler ("Psychometrika" 76:537-549, 2011) introduced an exploratory form of bi-factor…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Models, Comparative Analysis

McDonald, Roderick P. – Psychometrika, 1975
Gives a set of minimally sufficient axioms to define and distinguish common factor theory, image theory, and component theory and analyzes claims that have been made for image theory as a device for improving factor theory. (Author/RC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Models

Yung, Yiu-Fai; Thissen, David; McLeod, Lori D. – Psychometrika, 1999
Explores the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model and shows that the Schmid-Leiman transformation process (J. Schmid and J. Leiman, 1957) produces constrained hierarchical factor solutions. Shows that the two models are not mathematically equivalent unless appropriate direct effects are added. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Models

Kiers, Henk A. L. – Psychometrika, 1997
Five techniques that combine the ideals of rotation of matrices of factor loadings to optimal agreement and rotation to simple structure are compared on the basis of empirical and contrived data. Combining a generalized Procrustes analysis with Varimax on the main of the matched loading matrices performed well on all criteria. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Least Squares Statistics

Bechtoldt, Harold P. – Psychometrika, 1974
Procedures developed by Joreskog for studying similarities and differences in factor structures between different groups were applied to data from a study by Thurstoen to investigate the sampling stability of a hypothesized isolated configuration. The hypothesis of an isolated configuration was rejected but not by much. (Author/RC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Hypothesis Testing
Jennrich, Robert I. – Psychometrika, 2004
Component loss functions (CLFs) are used to generalize the quartimax criterion for orthogonal rotation in factor analysis. These replace the fourth powers of the factor loadings by an arbitrary function of the second powers. Criteria of this form were introduced by a number of authors, primarily Katz and Rohlf (1974) and Rozeboom (1991), but there…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Evaluation Criteria, Comparative Analysis

Cureton, Edward E.; Mulaik, Stanley A. – Psychometrika, 1975
Applications to the Promax Rotation are discussed, and it is shown that these procedures solve Thurstone's hitherto intractable "invariant" box problem as well as other more common problems based on real data. (Author/RC)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure

Hakstian, A. Ralph – Psychometrika, 1971
The oblimax, promax, maxplane, and Harris-Kaiser techniques are compared. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure