Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Readability | 3 |
Reading Comprehension | 2 |
Reading Processes | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Beliefs | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Computational Linguistics | 1 |
Content Area Reading | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Databases | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Reading Psychology | 3 |
Author
Anna E. Mason | 1 |
Danielle S. McNamara | 1 |
Daphne Greenberg | 1 |
Erica D. Kessler | 1 |
Gee, Thomas Carroll | 1 |
Jason L. G. Braasch | 1 |
Joon Suh Choi | 1 |
Laura K. Allen | 1 |
Scott Crossley | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Anna E. Mason; Jason L. G. Braasch; Daphne Greenberg; Erica D. Kessler; Laura K. Allen; Danielle S. McNamara – Reading Psychology, 2023
This study examined the extent to which prior beliefs and reading instructions impacted elements of a reader's mental representation of multiple texts. College students' beliefs about childhood vaccinations were assessed before reading two anti-vaccine and two pro-vaccine texts. Participants in the experimental condition read for the purpose of…
Descriptors: Immunization Programs, Misconceptions, Beliefs, Accuracy
Scott Crossley; Joon Suh Choi – Reading Psychology, 2024
This paper examines links between perfect rhymes and text readability and decoding using a measure of English rhymes called the Perfect Rhymes Dictionary (PeRDict). PeRDict is based on the Carnegie Mellon University Pronouncing Dictionary (the CMUdict) and provides rhyme counts for ~48,000 words in English and for the most frequent 1,000, 2,500,…
Descriptors: Measurement Techniques, Phonology, Pronunciation, Dictionaries

Gee, Thomas Carroll; And Others – Reading Psychology, 1985
Fifty fifth-grade students read passages at three readability levels from four content areas, then answered vocabulary, literal, and interpretive questions based on each passage. Significant differences in comprehension were found across ability levels and content areas. One sample passage is appended. (FL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Area Reading, Grade 5, Intermediate Grades