NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Coffman, Gerry A. – Reading Psychology, 1997
Investigates the influence of four types of predictions on the story understanding of sixth graders. Asks prediction questions, prediction plus justification questions, prediction plus review questions, or no questions. Analyzes retellings to determine information percentage included from original story. Indicates that differences in what students…
Descriptors: Grade 6, Intermediate Grades, Prediction, Questioning Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Samuels, S. Jay – Reading Psychology, 1989
Argues that in the last 10 years the field of cognitive science has added much to the understanding of how to promote text comprehension. Focuses on the role of questions, text structure, and causal network theory as an approach to comprehension enhancement. (RS)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Questioning Techniques, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sinatra, Gale M.; And Others – Reading Psychology, 1993
Notes that three groups of fifth graders either read an original social studies text, read a revised version, or were asked questions while reading the original text. Finds no differences among the three groups in amount of information recalled and the number of questions answered correctly, but students who were asked questions tended to recall…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Grade 5, Intermediate Grades, Questioning Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Feldt, Ronald C.; Feldt, Rebecca A.; Kilburg, Kristine – Reading Psychology, 2002
Examines acquisition, maintenance, and transfer of a questioning strategy in second- and third-grade students using a multiple-baseline design. Indicates that knowledge of text structure increased and that students could reliably differentiate text structure. Describes the establishment of a 4-week procedure for integrating the questioning…
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Grade 2, Grade 3, Instructional Effectiveness