NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dickson Okoree Mireku; Prosper Dzifa Dzamesi; Brandford Bervell – Research Ethics, 2024
The purpose of this study was to map the distribution of publications on plagiarism among higher educational institutions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Studies reviewed were based on 171 plagiarism related publications within a decade (2012-2022). Findings revealed that most plagiarism related articles were published in 2016. Additionally, a…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Plagiarism, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mohammad Hosseini; David B. Resnik – Research Ethics, 2025
Journals and publishers are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) to screen submissions for potential misconduct, including plagiarism and data or image manipulation. While using AI can enhance the integrity of published manuscripts, it can also increase the risk of false/unsubstantiated allegations. Ambiguities related to journals' and…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Plagiarism, Writing for Publication, Periodicals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bor Luen Tang – Research Ethics, 2024
Scientific research is supposed to acquire or generate knowledge, but such a purpose would be severely undermined by instances of research misconduct (RM) and questionable research practices (QRP). RM and QRP are often framed in terms of moral transgressions by individuals (bad apples) whose aberrant acts could be made conducive by shortcomings in…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Ethics, Integrity, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Holbeach, Naomi; Freckelton A.O. Q.C., Ian; Mol, Ben W. – Research Ethics, 2023
As the burden of misconduct in medical research is increasingly recognised, questions have been raised about how best to address this problem. Whilst there are existing mechanisms for the investigation and management of misconduct in medical literature, they are inadequate to deal with the magnitude of the problem. Journal editors and publishers…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Ethics, Editing, Periodicals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dal-Ré, Rafael; Bouter, Lex M.; Cuijpers, Pim; Gluud, Christian; Holm, Søren – Research Ethics, 2020
For more than 25 years, research misconduct (research fraud) is defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (FFP)--although other research misbehaviors have been also added in codes of conduct and legislations. A critical issue in deciding whether research misconduct should be subject to criminal law is its definition, because not all…
Descriptors: Research Problems, Deception, Ethics, Criminal Law
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Olivier Leclerc; Nicolas Klausser – Research Ethics, 2025
Reporting and investigating research misconduct can lead to disciplinary proceedings being initiated, and ultimately to disciplinary sanctions being imposed on convicted scientists. The conversion of research misconduct findings into disciplinary sanctions is poorly understood. This article analyses all the disciplinary decisions handed down on…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Graduate Students, Researchers, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sadeghi, Ramin – Research Ethics, 2019
Almost all researchers are familiar with the concept of plagiarism these days. However, many scholars allege that plagiarism and its ethical ramifications are new western concepts that have not existed in scientific and literary history. In their opinion, using the ideas of others was allowed liberally in past academic and literary communities. I…
Descriptors: Plagiarism, Ethics, Definitions, Publications
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kadri Simm; Mari-Liisa Parder; Anu Tammeleht; Kadri Lees – Research Ethics, 2024
While empirical studies of research ethics and integrity are increasingly common, few have aimed at national scope, and even fewer at current results from Central and Eastern Europe. This article introduces the results of the first national research integrity survey in Estonia, which included all research-performing organisations in Estonia, was…
Descriptors: Ethics, Integrity, Interdisciplinary Approach, Research Universities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dougherty, M. V. – Research Ethics, 2021
Qualitative fieldwork research on sensitive topics sometimes requires that interviewees be granted confidentiality and anonymity. When qualitative researchers later publish their findings, they must ensure that any statements obtained during fieldwork interviews cannot be traced back to the interviewees. Given these protections to interviewees,…
Descriptors: Confidentiality, Field Studies, Qualitative Research, Interviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yeo-Teh, Nicole Shu Ling; Tang, Bor Luen – Research Ethics, 2021
Hofmann and Holm's (2019) recent survey on issues of research misconduct with PhD graduates culminated with a notable conclusion by the authors: 'Scientific misconduct seems to be an environmental issue as much as a matter of personal integrity'. Here, we re-emphasise the usefulness of an education-based countermeasure against toxic research…
Descriptors: Research, Ethics, Integrity, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Drimer-Batca, Daniel; Iaccarino, Jonathan M.; Fine, Alan – Research Ethics, 2019
In order to assess the status of retraction notices for publications involving research misconduct, we collected and analyzed information from the Office of Research Integrity website. This site lists confirmed instances of misconduct in research supported by the National Institutes of Health. Over a 10-year period, 200 publications derived from…
Descriptors: Biomedicine, Ethics, Research Problems, Publications
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Redman, Barbara K.; Caplan, Arthur L. – Research Ethics, 2015
The proportion of research misconduct cases among trainees in the biomedical sciences has risen, raising the question of why, and what are the responsibilities of research administrators and the research community to address this problem. Although there is no definitive research about causes, for trainees the relationship with a research mentor…
Descriptors: Ethics, Biomedicine, Researchers, Administrator Role