NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Domínguez Islas, Clara; Rice, Kenneth M. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Bayesian methods seem a natural choice for combining sources of evidence in meta-analyses. However, in practice, their sensitivity to the choice of prior distribution is much less attractive, particularly for parameters describing heterogeneity. A recent non-Bayesian approach to fixed-effects meta-analysis provides novel ways to think about…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Evidence, Meta Analysis, Statistical Inference
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Du, Han; Bradbury, Thomas N.; Lavner, Justin A.; Meltzer, Andrea L.; McNulty, James K.; Neff, Lisa A.; Karney, Benjamin R. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Researchers often seek to synthesize results of multiple studies on the same topic to draw statistical or substantive conclusions and to estimate effect sizes that will inform power analyses for future research. The most popular synthesis approach is meta-analysis. There have been few discussions and applications of other synthesis approaches.…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Meta Analysis, Statistical Inference, Synthesis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weber, Frank; Knapp, Guido; Glass, Änne; Kundt, Günther; Ickstadt, Katja – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
There exists a variety of interval estimators for the overall treatment effect in a random-effects meta-analysis. A recent literature review summarizing existing methods suggested that in most situations, the Hartung-Knapp/Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) method was preferable. However, a quantitative comparison of those methods in a common simulation study…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Computation, Intervals, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Held, Leonhard; Matthews, Robert; Ott, Manuela; Pawel, Samuel – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
It is now widely accepted that the standard inferential toolkit used by the scientific research community--null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST)--is not fit for purpose. Yet despite the threat posed to the scientific enterprise, there is no agreement concerning alternative approaches for evidence assessment. This lack of consensus reflects…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Statistical Inference, Hypothesis Testing, Credibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jackson, Dan – Research Synthesis Methods, 2013
Statistical inference is problematic in the common situation in meta-analysis where the random effects model is fitted to just a handful of studies. In particular, the asymptotic theory of maximum likelihood provides a poor approximation, and Bayesian methods are sensitive to the prior specification. Hence, less efficient, but easily computed and…
Descriptors: Computation, Statistical Analysis, Meta Analysis, Statistical Inference
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Verde, Pablo E.; Ohmann, Christian – Research Synthesis Methods, 2015
Researchers may have multiple motivations for combining disparate pieces of evidence in a meta-analysis, such as generalizing experimental results or increasing the power to detect an effect that a single study is not able to detect. However, while in meta-analysis, the main question may be simple, the structure of evidence available to answer it…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis, Evidence