Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 2 |
| Classification | 2 |
| Databases | 2 |
| Documentation | 2 |
| Information Retrieval | 2 |
| Medical Research | 2 |
| Search Strategies | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Guidance | 1 |
| Metadata | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Synthesis Methods | 2 |
Author
| Thomas, James | 2 |
| Hong, Quan Nha | 1 |
| Kuiper, Joël | 1 |
| Langlois, Alexis | 1 |
| Marshall, Iain J. | 1 |
| Nie, Jian-Yun | 1 |
| Noel-Storr, Anna | 1 |
| Pluye, Pierre | 1 |
| Wallace, Byron C. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Langlois, Alexis; Nie, Jian-Yun; Thomas, James; Hong, Quan Nha; Pluye, Pierre – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Objective: Identify the most performant automated text classification method (eg, algorithm) for differentiating empirical studies from nonempirical works in order to facilitate systematic mixed studies reviews. Methods: The algorithms were trained and validated with 8050 database records, which had previously been manually categorized as…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Databases, Information Retrieval, Search Strategies
Marshall, Iain J.; Noel-Storr, Anna; Kuiper, Joël; Thomas, James; Wallace, Byron C. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Machine learning (ML) algorithms have proven highly accurate for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) but are not used much in practice, in part because the best way to make use of the technology in a typical workflow is unclear. In this work, we evaluate ML models for RCT classification (support vector machines, convolutional neural…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Accuracy, Computer Software, Classification

Peer reviewed
Direct link
