Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 3 |
| Meta Analysis | 3 |
| Evidence | 2 |
| Research Reports | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Synthesis Methods | 3 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
de Jong, Valentijn M. T.; Campbell, Harlan; Maxwell, Lauren; Jaenisch, Thomas; Gustafson, Paul; Debray, Thomas P. A. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
A common problem in the analysis of multiple data sources, including individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA), is the misclassification of binary variables. Misclassification may lead to biased estimators of model parameters, even when the misclassification is entirely random. We aimed to develop statistical methods that facilitate…
Descriptors: Classification, Meta Analysis, Bayesian Statistics, Evaluation Methods
Ryo, Masahiro; Jeschke, Jonathan M.; Rillig, Matthias C.; Heger, Tina – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Research synthesis on simple yet general hypotheses and ideas is challenging in scientific disciplines studying highly context-dependent systems such as medical, social, and biological sciences. This study shows that machine learning, equation-free statistical modeling of artificial intelligence, is a promising synthesis tool for discovering novel…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Case Studies, Biology, Research Reports
Moustgaard, Helene; Jones, Hayley E.; Savovic, Jelena; Clayton, Gemma L.; Sterne, Jonathan AC; Higgins, Julian PT; Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Randomized clinical trials underpin evidence-based clinical practice, but flaws in their conduct may lead to biased estimates of intervention effects and hence invalid treatment recommendations. The main approach to the empirical study of bias is to collate a number of meta-analyses and, within each, compare the results of trials with and without…
Descriptors: Epidemiology, Evidence, Medical Research, Intervention

Peer reviewed
Direct link
