Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Computer Software | 5 |
Synthesis | 5 |
Automation | 4 |
Duplication | 2 |
Evidence | 2 |
Literature Reviews | 2 |
Online Searching | 2 |
Bias | 1 |
Content Analysis | 1 |
Data | 1 |
Data Processing | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Research Synthesis Methods | 5 |
Author
Andrea Tricco | 1 |
Ashrita Saran | 1 |
Catrin Evans | 1 |
Christina M. Godfrey | 1 |
Daniel Ameen | 1 |
Danielle Pollock | 1 |
Dawid Pieper | 1 |
Erica B. Moraes | 1 |
Garside, Ruth | 1 |
Green, Judith | 1 |
Guell, Cornelia | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sandra McKeown; Zuhaib M. Mir – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Searching multiple resources to locate eligible studies for research syntheses can result in hundreds to thousands of duplicate references that should be removed before the screening process for efficiency. Research investigating the performance of automated methods for deduplicating references via reference managers and systematic review software…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Evaluation, Followup Studies, Automation
Hanan Khalil; Danielle Pollock; Patricia McInerney; Catrin Evans; Erica B. Moraes; Christina M. Godfrey; Lyndsay Alexander; Andrea Tricco; Micah D. J. Peters; Dawid Pieper; Ashrita Saran; Daniel Ameen; Petek Eylul Taneri; Zachary Munn – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Objective: This paper describes several automation tools and software that can be considered during evidence synthesis projects and provides guidance for their integration in the conduct of scoping reviews. Study Design and Setting: The guidance presented in this work is adapted from the results of a scoping review and consultations with the JBI…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Software, Synthesis, Protocol Analysis
McGuinness, Luke A.; Higgins, Julian P. T. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
Despite a major increase in the range and number of software offerings now available to help researchers produce evidence syntheses, there is currently no generic tool for producing figures to display and explore the risk-of-bias assessments that routinely take place as part of systematic review. However, tools such as the R programming…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Visual Aids, Synthesis, Evidence
Sutton, Anthea; O'Keefe, Hannah; Johnson, Eugenie Evelynne; Marshall, Christopher – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
The Systematic Review Toolbox aims provide a web-based catalogue of tools that support various tasks within the systematic review and wider evidence synthesis process. Identifying publications surrounding specific systematic review tools is currently challenging, leading to a high screening burden for few eligible records. We aimed to develop a…
Descriptors: Search Strategies, Automation, Evidence, Synthesis
Haynes, Emily; Garside, Ruth; Green, Judith; Kelly, Michael P.; Thomas, James; Guell, Cornelia – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Approaches to synthesizing qualitative data have, to date, largely focused on integrating the findings from published reports. However, developments in text mining software offer the potential for efficient analysis of large pooled primary qualitative datasets. This case study aimed to (a) provide a step-by-step guide to using one software…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Data, Synthesis, Automation