Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Databases | 2 |
Educational Research | 2 |
Online Searching | 2 |
Research Methodology | 2 |
Search Strategies | 2 |
Access to Information | 1 |
COVID-19 | 1 |
Educational Researchers | 1 |
Evidence | 1 |
Heuristics | 1 |
Information Retrieval | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Research Synthesis Methods | 2 |
Author
Greig, Judy D. | 1 |
Gusenbauer, Michael | 1 |
Haddaway, Neal R. | 1 |
McEwen, Scott A. | 1 |
Papadopoulos, Andrew | 1 |
Pham, Mai T. | 1 |
Rajic, Andrijana | 1 |
Sargeant, Jan M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gusenbauer, Michael; Haddaway, Neal R. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
We researchers have taken searching for information for granted for far too long. The COVID-19 pandemic shows us the boundaries of academic searching capabilities, both in terms of our know-how and of the systems we have. With hundreds of studies published daily on COVID-19, for example, we struggle to find, stay up-to-date, and synthesize…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Educational Researchers, Research Methodology, Information Seeking
Pham, Mai T.; Rajic, Andrijana; Greig, Judy D.; Sargeant, Jan M.; Papadopoulos, Andrew; McEwen, Scott A. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2014
Background: The scoping review has become an increasingly popular approach for synthesizing research evidence. It is a relatively new approach for which a universal study definition or definitive procedure has not been established. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of scoping reviews in the literature. Methods: A…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Synthesis, Evidence, Literature Reviews