Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Graphs | 2 |
| Meta Analysis | 2 |
| Regression (Statistics) | 2 |
| Statistical Distributions | 2 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Data Interpretation | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Heterogeneous Grouping | 1 |
| Intervals | 1 |
| Networks | 1 |
| Online Surveys | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Synthesis Methods | 2 |
Author
| Dias, Sofia | 1 |
| Donegan, Sarah | 1 |
| Marinho, Valeria | 1 |
| Schild, Anne H. E. | 1 |
| Tudur-Smith, Catrin | 1 |
| Voracek, Martin | 1 |
| Welton, Nicky J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDonegan, Sarah; Dias, Sofia; Tudur-Smith, Catrin; Marinho, Valeria; Welton, Nicky J. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Background: Meta-regression results must be interpreted taking into account the range of covariate values of the contributing studies. Results based on interpolation or extrapolation may be unreliable. In network meta-regression (NMR) models, which include covariates in network meta-analyses, results are estimated using direct and indirect…
Descriptors: Graphs, Networks, Meta Analysis, Regression (Statistics)
Schild, Anne H. E.; Voracek, Martin – Research Synthesis Methods, 2015
Research has shown that forest plots are a gold standard in the visualization of meta-analytic results. However, research on the general interpretation of forest plots and the role of researchers' meta-analysis experience and field of study is still unavailable. Additionally, the traditional display of effect sizes, confidence intervals, and…
Descriptors: Graphs, Visualization, Meta Analysis, Data Interpretation
