Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Effect Size | 2 |
Error of Measurement | 2 |
Intervals | 2 |
Meta Analysis | 2 |
Monte Carlo Methods | 2 |
Statistical Bias | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Maximum Likelihood Statistics | 1 |
Regression (Statistics) | 1 |
Source
Research Synthesis Methods | 2 |
Author
López-López, José Antonio | 2 |
Van den Noortgate, Wim | 2 |
Lipsey, Mark W. | 1 |
Marín-Martínez, Fulgencio | 1 |
Rubio-Aparicio, María | 1 |
Sánchez-Meca, Julio | 1 |
Tanner-Smith, Emily E. | 1 |
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang | 1 |
Wilson, Sandra Jo | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rubio-Aparicio, María; López-López, José Antonio; Sánchez-Meca, Julio; Marín-Martínez, Fulgencio; Viechtbauer, Wolfgang; Van den Noortgate, Wim – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
The random-effects model, applied in most meta-analyses nowadays, typically assumes normality of the distribution of the effect parameters. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of various random-effects methods (standard method, Hartung's method, profile likelihood method, and bootstrapping) for computing an average effect size…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Meta Analysis, Intervals, Monte Carlo Methods
López-López, José Antonio; Van den Noortgate, Wim; Tanner-Smith, Emily E.; Wilson, Sandra Jo; Lipsey, Mark W. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2017
Dependent effect sizes are ubiquitous in meta-analysis. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we compared the performance of 2 methods for meta-regression with dependent effect sizes--robust variance estimation (RVE) and 3-level modeling--with the standard meta-analytic method for independent effect sizes. We further compared bias-reduced linearization…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Regression (Statistics), Meta Analysis, Comparative Analysis