Descriptor
Source
Research in Higher Education | 9 |
Author
Bare, Alan C. | 1 |
Brandenburg, Dale C. | 1 |
Cohen, Peter A. | 1 |
Gillmore, Gerald M. | 1 |
Gray, David M. | 1 |
Johnson, James F. | 1 |
McCallum, L. W. | 1 |
Romney, David | 1 |
Siegel, Laurence | 1 |
Trent, Curtis | 1 |
Wigington, Henry | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Bare, Alan C. – Research in Higher Education, 1981
The performance of 43 library work groups was assessed by means of supervisor's ratings. Characteristics of the groups' tasks, membership, leadership, structure, and process were measured by averaging their members' responses to factor of the Work Group Survey. The implications for both organization theorists and change agents are discussed.…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Evaluation, Group Dynamics, Group Structure

Romney, David – Research in Higher Education, 1980
Gerald M. Gillmore's criticisms of a study on the relative magnitudes of the "course effect" and "teacher effect" on students' ratings of teacher competence are examined. It is suggested that Gillmore's criticisms should not be permitted to detract from the conclusion that there is a significant course effect. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Competence, Course Evaluation, Data Analysis, Higher Education

Gillmore, Gerald M. – Research in Higher Education, 1980
The critical issues, in a dispute between Romney's interpretation of his results and Gillmore's interpretation, are described as whether the teacher factor should be treated as fixed or random in the analysis of variance model and what conclusions can be drawn from the results of the study. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Data Collection, Higher Education, Research Methodology

Siegel, Laurence – Research in Higher Education, 1978
An evaluation performance program specifically oriented toward such administrative actions as tenure, promotion, and salary adjustment is described. It uses task analysis to clarify the nature of the desired evaluative content and peer review as the primary evaluative mechanism. Its use in a psychology department is discussed. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education

Trent, Curtis; Johnson, James F. – Research in Higher Education, 1977
Results of a survey of 65 graduate students suggest that students' values and attitudes play a major role in their evaluation of faculty and should be recognized by teachers when interpreting the data from such ratings. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Data Analysis, Graduate Students, Higher Education

McCallum, L. W. – Research in Higher Education, 1984
A meta-analysis of studies examining the criterion validity of student course evaluation data is discussed. Results indicate that the overall size of effect is not only highly significant, but also very meaningful when analyzed in relation to enhancing the likelihood of making more accurate tenure decisions. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Data Analysis, Decision Making, Faculty Evaluation

Cohen, Peter A. – Research in Higher Education, 1980
A meta-analytic methodology is applied to integrate findings from 22 comparisons of the effectiveness of student- rating feedback at the college level. Feedback had a modest but significant effect on improving instruction. The effects of student-rating feedback were accentuated when augmentation or consultation accompanied the ratings. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Course Evaluation, Data Analysis, Faculty Development

Gray, David M.; Brandenburg, Dale C. – Research in Higher Education, 1985
Two factors were investigated: the longitudinal nature of student ratings of instructors and the use of item banks for designing student rating questionnaires, especially for instructor feedback. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Achievement Rating, College Faculty, Data Analysis

Wigington, Henry; And Others – Research in Higher Education, 1989
In order to determine how situational variables influence students when they evaluate an instructor, the individual student as the unit of analysis was used. Interactions between three variables related to class (type, level, and size) and three related to instructor (reputation, rank, and sex) were examined. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Class Size, Classes (Groups of Students), College Faculty