Descriptor
| College Faculty | 2 |
| Faculty Workload | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Surveys | 2 |
| Academic Rank (Professional) | 1 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Congruence (Psychology) | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research in Higher Education | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMcLaughlin, Gerald W.; And Others – Research in Higher Education, 1981
A study on a survey of department heads in 25 major universities that examines what department heads perceive to be the component parts in making assignments to faculty is discussed. The importance of evaluating faculty based on effort required rather than on time devoted to given tasks is stressed. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Content Analysis, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Workload
Peer reviewedZey-Ferrell, Mary; Ervin, Delbert – Research in Higher Education, 1985
Two explanations of congruency of ideal (intent) and actual (action/behavior) work of faculty are examined--reward expectations and referent others. Based on interviews, a survey, and institutional data, it was found that referent others' goals have a greater influence than reward expectations on the congruency of work. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Administrators, College Faculty, Congruence (Psychology)
