NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haas, Christina – Research in the Teaching of English, 1989
Presents a study examining the effects of using pen and paper and word processing on planning processes. Results show that writers using word processing alone: (1) planned less overall; (2) planned less before beginning to write; (3) did less conceptual planning; and (4) did more sequential or local planning. (RAE)
Descriptors: Concept Formation, Higher Education, Planning, Protocol Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haas, Christina; Hayes, John R. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1986
Relates how 16 "computer writers" felt about how they use the computer for writing tasks and reports on three experimental studies that compared the performance of college students reading texts displayed on a computer terminal screen and on a printed hard copy. Findings showed that visual/spatial factors influenced locational recall,…
Descriptors: Attitudes, Critical Reading, Higher Education, Information Retrieval
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Daiute, Colette – Research in the Teaching of English, 1986
Contrasts the revising patterns of junior high school students when they used a word processor and pens and paper. Concludes that those who used a word processing program added more words to the ends of their texts and corrected more errors, but did not make more global text revisions than when they used a pen. (HOD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Editing, Grade 7
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dickinson, David K. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1986
Assesses the effects of the introduction of a computer into the writing program of a first and second grade classroom on cooperation and collaboration among the students. Results show that collaborative work at the computer created a new social organization that affected interactional patterns. (SRT)
Descriptors: Cooperation, Ethnography, Group Activities, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lutz, Jean A. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1987
Uses text processing (computer) and pen and paper protocols to compare the revising process of professional writers and experienced writers (PhD students). Concludes tentatively that (1) professional and experienced writers do not differ in their approach; (2) the interaction between human and machine influences the writing process; and (3) that…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Editing, Expository Writing