NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Polanin, Joshua R.; Tanner-Smith, Emily E.; Hennessy, Emily A. – Review of Educational Research, 2016
Practitioners and policymakers rely on meta-analyses to inform decision making around the allocation of resources to individuals and organizations. It is therefore paramount to consider the validity of these results. A well-documented threat to the validity of research synthesis results is the presence of publication bias, a phenomenon where…
Descriptors: Publications, Periodicals, Bias, Effect Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lazowski, Rory A.; Hulleman, Chris S. – Review of Educational Research, 2016
This meta-analysis provides an extensive and organized summary of intervention studies in education that are grounded in motivation theory. We identified 74 published and unpublished papers that experimentally manipulated an independent variable and measured an authentic educational outcome within an ecologically valid educational context. Our…
Descriptors: Student Motivation, Intervention, Meta Analysis, Effect Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clark, Douglas B.; Tanner-Smith, Emily E.; Killingsworth, Stephen S. – Review of Educational Research, 2016
In this meta-analysis, we systematically reviewed research on digital games and learning for K-16 students. We synthesized comparisons of game versus nongame conditions (i.e., media comparisons) and comparisons of augmented games versus standard game designs (i.e., value-added comparisons). We used random-effects meta-regression models with robust…
Descriptors: Educational Games, Computer Games, Meta Analysis, Multiple Regression Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marsh, Herbert W.; Bornmann, Lutz; Mutz, Rudiger; Daniel, Hans-Dieter; O'Mara, Alison – Review of Educational Research, 2009
Peer review is valued in higher education, but also widely criticized in terms of potential biases, particularly gender. We evaluate gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications, extending Bornmann, Mutz, and Daniel's meta-analyses that reported small gender differences in favor of men (d = 0.04), but a substantial heterogeneity in…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Gender Differences, Grants, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lix, Lisa M.; And Others – Review of Educational Research, 1996
Meta-analytic techniques were used to summarize the statistical robustness literature on Type I error properties of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance "F" test. The James (1951) and Welch (1951) tests performed best under violations of the variance homogeneity assumption, although their use is not always appropriate. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Meta Analysis, Robustness (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ogawa, Rodney T.; Malen, Betty – Review of Educational Research, 1991
Multivocal literatures are comprised of all accessible writings on a common topic and embody the views of diverse authors. The exploratory case study method is proposed as a way to ensure rigor in reviews of such literatures because it addresses problems associated with the selective use of data. (SLD)
Descriptors: Bias, Case Studies, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sawilowsky, Shlomo S. – Review of Educational Research, 1990
Research over the past 15 years concerning parametric and nonparametric statistics and 10 recently developed nonparametric techniques for testing interactions in experimental design are reviewed. The new nonparametric techniques are robust, powerful, versatile, and easy to compute. A fabricated dataset is used to illustrate the technique. (TJH)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Educational Research, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keselman, H. J.; Huberty, Carl J.; Lix, Lisa M.; Olejnik, Stephen; Cribbie, Robert A.; Donahue, Barbara; Kowalchuk, Rhonda K.; Lowman, Laureen L.; Petoskey, Martha D.; Levin, Joel R.; Keselman, Joanne C. – Review of Educational Research, 1998
The use of analysis of variance (ANOVA), multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) by educational researchers was studied through review of several prominent research journals. The analyses suggest that researchers rarely verify that validity assumptions are satisfied, and typically use analyses that are…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Educational Research, Literature Reviews