Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Personality Traits | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Constructivism (Learning) | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Roeper Review | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| NEO Five Factor Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGrant, Barry – Roeper Review, 2021
A recent study claiming to provide a basis for gifted education to drop the construct of overexcitabilities in favor of the construct of openness to experience and align itself with the Five Factor Model and a talent development perspective on gifted education is shown to be without merit. An analysis shows that the study supports the conclusion…
Descriptors: Criticism, Talent Development, Gifted Education, Teaching Methods
French, Lisa R.; Walker, Cheryl L.; Shore, Bruce M. – Roeper Review, 2011
Gifted students' preference to work alone is widely espoused, but studies vary widely in their explanations. We re-examined this notion in terms of motivation and social constructivism among 247 school-identified gifted and high-achieving and regular-education students in Grades 4 through 12. Survey data assessed learning style, interests,…
Descriptors: Constructivism (Learning), Cognitive Style, Student Attitudes, Academically Gifted
