Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Coding | 4 |
Persuasive Discourse | 4 |
Classroom Communication | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Science Education | 2 |
Science Instruction | 2 |
Science Teachers | 2 |
Causal Models | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Discourse Analysis | 1 |
Ecology | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Science Education | 4 |
Author
Erduran, Sibel | 2 |
Felton, Mark | 1 |
Garcia-Mila, Merce | 1 |
Gilabert, Sandra | 1 |
MacPherson, Anna C. | 1 |
Manz, Eve | 1 |
Osborne, Jonathan | 1 |
Renga, Ian Parker | 1 |
Simon, Shirley | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 7 | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Spain (Barcelona) | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Manz, Eve; Renga, Ian Parker – Science Education, 2017
Many classroom units and lessons are now organized around engaging students in developing claims and evidence. An aspect of teachers' work that is understudied is how teachers manage the complexity inherent in navigating between claims and empirical data. In other words, what do teachers do when students do not see what they are "supposed…
Descriptors: Science Teachers, Science Instruction, Science Process Skills, Classroom Communication
MacPherson, Anna C. – Science Education, 2016
This study sought to investigate the arguments that ecologists engage in as part of their work and to compare their arguments with the way in which ecological arguments have been presented in school argumentation tasks. Ten ecologists, in subfields ranging from individual/behavioral ecology to global ecology, participated in semistructured…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Ecology, Scientists, Persuasive Discourse
Garcia-Mila, Merce; Gilabert, Sandra; Erduran, Sibel; Felton, Mark – Science Education, 2013
In argumentative discourse, there are two kinds of activity--dispute and deliberation--that depend on the argumentative task goal. In dispute the goal is to defend a conclusion by undermining alternatives, whereas in deliberation the goal is to arrive at a conclusion by contrasting alternatives. In this study, we examine the impact of these tasks…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Junior High School Students, Discourse Analysis, Energy
Erduran, Sibel; Simon, Shirley; Osborne, Jonathan – Science Education, 2004
This paper reports some methodological approaches to the analysis of argumentation discourse developed as part of the two-and-a-half year project titled "Enhancing the Quality of Argument in School Science" supported by the Economic and Social Research Council in the United Kingdom. In this project researchers collaborated with…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Foreign Countries, Research Methodology, Science Teachers