NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burlingame, Gary; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Proposes a multidimensional system based on commonly used measurement parameters in group research. Combines and crosses four dimensions describing the who, what, how, and when, of process measurement as a first step toward an orderly classification system. (Author/LLL)
Descriptors: Classification, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fuhriman, Addie; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Presents problems associated with process analysis with a specific focus on definitional and methodological concerns. Discusses the need for a comprehensive system that will help researchers to separate and comprehend the individual parts of a group and their relationship to the whole group. (Author/LLL)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ruzicka, Mary F.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1979
The purposes of this paper are to note specific weaknesses characterizing small group research and to propose suggestions for their solution. Adapted from a speech given at the Second National Conference about the Teaching of Group: Theory and Practice, Temple University, Philadelphia, February 1976. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Behavior, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fisher, B. Aubrey; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1979
The purpose of this paper is to present a new analytical system to be used in communication research. Unlike many existing systems devised ad hoc, this research tool, a system for interaction analysis, is embedded in a conceptual rationale based on modern systems theory. (Author)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Information Processing, Interaction Process Analysis, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Norton, Robert W. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Maintains that coalitions form as a function of the popularity of an individual and the reciprocation between individuals. An algorithm is introduced, incorporating both popularity and reciprocation components, to generate units of analysis for coalition identification. The algorithm reflects aspects of the whole group and intensity of dyads.…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ettin, Mark F. – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Sees introduction of specific structures and exercises in psychotherapy group as directly controlling course of events and affecting members' perceptions of the group and leader. Asserts that exercises must highlight, rather than bypass, existing group processes. Presents five-step model for preparing, working with, processing, generalizing, and…
Descriptors: Group Activities, Group Discussion, Group Dynamics, Group Guidance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mabry, Edward A. – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Analyzed contrasting assumptions of three theoretical orientations used to explain mixed-sex small group interaction through observation of two mixed-sex, human relations training groups of undergraduate students (N=45). Found no support for sex-role differentiation or adaptation orientations but did find support for role-status expectation…
Descriptors: Females, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Higher Education