Descriptor
Source
| Small Group Behavior | 8 |
Author
| Barr, Joseph E. | 1 |
| Conyne, Robert K. | 1 |
| Cooper, Cary L. | 1 |
| Edney, Julian J. | 1 |
| Kobayashi, Koichiro | 1 |
| McIntire, Walter G. | 1 |
| Silbergeld, Sam | 1 |
| Silver, Robert J. | 1 |
| Sisson, C. J. | 1 |
| Uhlig, Susan R. | 1 |
| Ware, J. Roger | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Personal Orientation Inventory | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCooper, Cary L.; Kobayashi, Koichiro – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Compares the differences between the impact of sensitivity training in the Far East as compared to the West. Subjects were 18 English college students and 18 Japanese college students. Results indicate that the T groups had a significant impact on the English subjects but not on the Japanese subjects. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Cross Cultural Studies, Cultural Differences
Peer reviewedSilver, Robert J.; Conyne, Robert K. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Tests the hypothesis that if direct small group experience was shown to be relatively more effective than vicarious experience in heightening attraction, then a significant assumption of T-group theory would receive support. Results support the hypothesis. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Counseling Effectiveness
Peer reviewedEdney, Julian J.; Uhlig, Susan R. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Explores the reactions of single persons and small groups-each in a room they had territorialized- and to compare these against the reactions of singles and small groups who were in a comparable room which they had not territorialized. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Comparative Analysis, Environmental Influences, Group Behavior
Peer reviewedSilbergeld, Sam; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
To assess two group models being developed in the Mental Health Study Center, NIMH, this paper compares HIM data from these models with norms from a previous study. By contrasting HIM results from groups of married couples, young adolescents, and parents and teachers, one obtains a better understanding of the effectiveness of these models. (Author)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedSisson, C. J.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The purpose of this investigation is to compare the descriptions of group process obtained from the Hill Interaction Matrix (Form G) and the Bonney Scale in rating an extended counseling group of psychiatric residents (N = 10). (Author)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Conceptual Schemes, Graduate Students
Peer reviewedWogan, Michael; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Tests the hypothesis that cognitive-experiential pretraining is beneficial in promoting openness and honesty among members of a psychotherapy group. The hypothesis is supported. (HMV)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Counseling Effectiveness, Group Behavior
Peer reviewedMcIntire, Walter G.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The purpose of this study was to determine if preferred modes of interaction, as measured by the HIM-B, are related to a major spousal interaction variable, marital happiness. Specifically, it examines the potential of Hill's conceptual model, and instrument, for enhancing our understanding of marital interaction in combination with some…
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Comparative Analysis, Conceptual Schemes, Family Life
Peer reviewedWare, J. Roger; Barr, Joseph E. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Investigates the amount of structure furnished by the leader in the group experience over a nine-week period and its effects on measures of self-concept and self-actualization. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Counseling Effectiveness, Group Counseling, Group Therapy
