Descriptor
Groups | 6 |
Interaction Process Analysis | 6 |
Group Dynamics | 3 |
Group Therapy | 3 |
Social Relations | 3 |
Group Behavior | 2 |
Interpersonal Relationship | 2 |
Peer Evaluation | 2 |
College Students | 1 |
Developmental Stages | 1 |
Disclosure | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Small Group Behavior | 6 |
Author
DeJulio, Steven | 1 |
Freedman, Sharai M. | 1 |
Hurley, John R. | 1 |
Lustig, Myron W. | 1 |
Melnick, Joseph | 1 |
Rose, Gary S. | 1 |
Smith, Peter B. | 1 |
Tindall, Jeffry | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Melnick, Joseph; Rose, Gary S. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Identifying clients is of prime importance to group leaders. Two variables which have proved useful in understanding therapeutic performance are social risk taking propensity and client expectancy. The present study was concerned with the prediction of group member performance following pretreatment assessment of these two variables. (Author)
Descriptors: Expectation, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Groups

Smith, Peter B. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Data show three patterns of response to the sensitivity training experience, an enhanced rate of change in some opposite sex relationships, more satisfaction with various types of elders, and dissatisfaction coupled with a possibly declining rate of change among same-sex work equals. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Therapy, Groups, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship

Tindall, Jeffry – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Time-limited and time-extended groups studied appeared to be similar in stage development with abnormalities in process accounted for by the amount of time the groups have continuously met. Support was given to the concept of stages as a series of cyclical movements characterized by clusterings of related behaviors. (Author)
Descriptors: Developmental Stages, Group Behavior, Group Therapy, Groups

DeJulio, Steven; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Compared the effects of traditional group norming techniques with a method where suggested norms are explicitly outlined at the beginning of the group. Data were analyzed to discover if there were significant differences between traditional norm groups and suggested norm groups in amount of interaction. (Author)
Descriptors: Disclosure, Group Dynamics, Group Norms, Groups

Lustig, Myron W. – Small Group Behavior, 1987
Investigated reliability and dimensionality of Bales's Interpersonal Rating Forms (IRF) using volunteer subjects (N=266) enrolled in undergraduate communications course. Results documented shortcomings of IRF as a measuring instrument finding the subscales neither reliable nor dimensionally structured; only 2 of 18 items in each subscale are…
Descriptors: College Students, Group Behavior, Groups, Higher Education

Freedman, Sharai M.; Hurley, John R. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Findings suggest that peers' ratings of behavior of coparticipants in small, interpersonally oriented groups might yield valid data on how accepting the participants were of both others and self. An instrument designed to assess both self-acceptance and the acceptance of others in small groups was used to measure personality. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Groups, Individual Development, Interaction Process Analysis