NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 92 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burlingame, Gary; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Proposes a multidimensional system based on commonly used measurement parameters in group research. Combines and crosses four dimensions describing the who, what, how, and when, of process measurement as a first step toward an orderly classification system. (Author/LLL)
Descriptors: Classification, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fuhriman, Addie; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Presents problems associated with process analysis with a specific focus on definitional and methodological concerns. Discusses the need for a comprehensive system that will help researchers to separate and comprehend the individual parts of a group and their relationship to the whole group. (Author/LLL)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sigman, Stuart J. – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Describes selected rules that may be abstracted from discussions in a given natural group, in this case, a nursing home admissions board. Suggested that to comprehend group structure, investigators must move beyond the internal units of conversation and consider conversational behavior in the larger context of an ethnographic present. (LLL)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ruzicka, Mary F.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1979
The purposes of this paper are to note specific weaknesses characterizing small group research and to propose suggestions for their solution. Adapted from a speech given at the Second National Conference about the Teaching of Group: Theory and Practice, Temple University, Philadelphia, February 1976. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Behavior, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fisher, B. Aubrey; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1979
The purpose of this paper is to present a new analytical system to be used in communication research. Unlike many existing systems devised ad hoc, this research tool, a system for interaction analysis, is embedded in a conceptual rationale based on modern systems theory. (Author)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Information Processing, Interaction Process Analysis, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trujillo, Nick – Small Group Behavior, 1986
Presents an exploratory taxonomy of small group interaction-coding systems. Six dimensions that characterize interaction-coding schemes are presented in a hierarchical order ranging from abstract conceptual issues to specific methodological ones. These dimensions are: philosophical perspective, conceptual and operational focus, observer inference,…
Descriptors: Classification, Communication Research, Group Dynamics, Interaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Norton, Robert W. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Maintains that coalitions form as a function of the popularity of an individual and the reciprocation between individuals. An algorithm is introduced, incorporating both popularity and reciprocation components, to generate units of analysis for coalition identification. The algorithm reflects aspects of the whole group and intensity of dyads.…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ratner, R. S.; Hathaway, Craig T. – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Examines the nature of development of a self-analytic seminar through stages and its impact on sex-role stereotypes and gender interactions among participants and with the seminar leaders. Explores relationships between feminist thought and psychoanalysis and supports the positive influence on recognition of mutual needs among the sexes.…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Group Behavior, Interaction Process Analysis, Leadership
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Melnick, Joseph; Rose, Gary S. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Identifying clients is of prime importance to group leaders. Two variables which have proved useful in understanding therapeutic performance are social risk taking propensity and client expectancy. The present study was concerned with the prediction of group member performance following pretreatment assessment of these two variables. (Author)
Descriptors: Expectation, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Peter B. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Data show three patterns of response to the sensitivity training experience, an enhanced rate of change in some opposite sex relationships, more satisfaction with various types of elders, and dissatisfaction coupled with a possibly declining rate of change among same-sex work equals. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Therapy, Groups, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tschuschke, Volker; MacKenzie, K. Roy – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Rated selected sessions of two long-term psychotherapy groups (N=143) using Gottschalk-Gleser anxiety and hostility verbal content analysis scales. Found group judged to be clinically more successful demonstrated prolonged periods in various states and that affect dimensions of states were consistent with group developmental stage hypothesis…
Descriptors: Anxiety, Foreign Countries, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reddy, W. Brendan; Beers, Thomas – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Explores the dimensions of self-concept in response to sensitivity training, i.e., that psychologically healthy participants would make greater gains in self-actualization than would those participants who viewed themselves as less healthy. Results support the hypothesis. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Research Projects, Self Actualization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ford, David L., Jr.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
To explore the issue of the impact of group tradition on decision-making performance, the present study was designed to compare the decision-making effectiveness of ad hoc and established groups engaged in a consensus-type decision-making task. (Author)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Organizational Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Powell, Evan R. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study uses two methods of analysis to examine the degree to which items within the cells of the Hill Interaction Matrix correlate. It is found that the table of specifications does not hold up. But the author recommends caution in interpreting this finding. (Author/BP)
Descriptors: Classification, Conceptual Schemes, Correlation, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levenstein, Joseph; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Tests the hypothesis that a response to a given feedback statement will be its reciprocal. In Phase 1, a pool of feedback statements was written and scaled along dimensions of power (dominance-submission) and affect (affection-hostility). In Phase 2, these statements were used as the basis for giving feedback and replying to it. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Feedback, Interaction Process Analysis
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7